2009
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SUSY breaking in local string/F-theory models

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
338
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
10
338
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 If B is taken to be a supersymmetry-breaking sector, and A is the visible sector, then the notion of decoupling described here corresponds to what is called sequestering [508] in the literature on supersymmetry breaking. Investigations of sequestering in string theory [509][510][511][512][513][514] have confirmed that complete decoupling is extremely rare, but partial suppression of some couplings can occur in certain cases [512].…”
Section: Compactness and Non-decouplingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5 If B is taken to be a supersymmetry-breaking sector, and A is the visible sector, then the notion of decoupling described here corresponds to what is called sequestering [508] in the literature on supersymmetry breaking. Investigations of sequestering in string theory [509][510][511][512][513][514] have confirmed that complete decoupling is extremely rare, but partial suppression of some couplings can occur in certain cases [512].…”
Section: Compactness and Non-decouplingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To make this rate comparable to the decay rate into Higgs fields, we would need a mass for matter scalars close to the threshold m soft = m τ b /2. In the sequestered case, soft scalar masses arise at least at a scale m soft ∼ M P /V 2 , but could also be as high as m soft ∼ M P /V 3/2 [19]. 5 To determine the exact scale requires knowledge of yet undetermined corrections to the Kähler potential.…”
Section: Jhep09(2014)140mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative to the geometric regime is to imagine the SM is built from fractional D-branes located at the singularity obtained by shrinking the blow-up mode supporting the SM brane: τ SM → 0 [63,64]. In this scenario τ SM cannot be any of the Kähler moduli discussed in previous sections, since these are all larger than l s by assumption.…”
Section: Jhep10(2011)119mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again we need a fourth cycle, τ 4 , to support the SM branes. If this cycle is rigid and does not intersect any of the other cycles, then τ 4 can be forced to shrink at the singularity, τ 4 → 0, using D-terms [63,64]. This picture has two attractive features.…”
Section: Jhep10(2011)119mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation