2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swedish midwives' rating of risks during labour progress and their attitudes toward performing intrapartum interventions: a web-based survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study shows that practices differ among midwives as a function of their experience but also of their place of work, as previously reported in the literature (Wiklund et al, 2012;Zinsser et al, 2016). Different authors have observed more physiological practices in out-ofhospital birth centers (Zinsser et al, 2016;Baba et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Our study shows that practices differ among midwives as a function of their experience but also of their place of work, as previously reported in the literature (Wiklund et al, 2012;Zinsser et al, 2016). Different authors have observed more physiological practices in out-ofhospital birth centers (Zinsser et al, 2016;Baba et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Mead and Kornbrot found that midwives developed heightened perception of risk when exposed to interventions in units where more patients required them for medical reasons. RNs and midwives with elevated perception of intrapartum risk are more inclined to use medical interventions, including those which often act as barriers to birth without epidural. For example, routine use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring for all birthing patients hinders provision of labor support to patients who prefer birth without epidural .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have discussed how midwives attitudes to labour and birth might have an impact on labour progress [28]. The present analysis has not investigated midwives attitudes, nevertheless is it important to note that our analysis removes non-compliers, which might mean that the women who gave birth on the birth seat were attended by a midwife who was generally more positive to the idea of upright birthing positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%