2006
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2006.876946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic Control of Linear Systems Based on Symbolic Subsystems

Abstract: Abstract-This paper describes an approach to the control of continuous systems through the use of symbolic models describing the system behavior only at a finite number of points in the state space. These symbolic models can be seen as abstract representations of the continuous dynamics enabling the use of algorithmic controller design methods. We identify a class of linear control systems for which the loss of information incurred by working with symbolic subsystems can be compensated by feedback. We also sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This more flexible notion of bisimulation allows the identification of more classes of systems, admitting symbolic models. Indeed, the work in [Tab06] showed that for every asymptotically stabilizable linear control system it is possible to construct a symbolic model, which is based on an approximate notion of simulation (one-sided version of approximate bisimulation). Extensions of the results in [Tab06], from approximate simulation to approximate bisimulation can be found in [Gir07,PGT07].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This more flexible notion of bisimulation allows the identification of more classes of systems, admitting symbolic models. Indeed, the work in [Tab06] showed that for every asymptotically stabilizable linear control system it is possible to construct a symbolic model, which is based on an approximate notion of simulation (one-sided version of approximate bisimulation). Extensions of the results in [Tab06], from approximate simulation to approximate bisimulation can be found in [Gir07,PGT07].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the work in [Tab06] showed that for every asymptotically stabilizable linear control system it is possible to construct a symbolic model, which is based on an approximate notion of simulation (one-sided version of approximate bisimulation). Extensions of the results in [Tab06], from approximate simulation to approximate bisimulation can be found in [Gir07,PGT07]. In particular [PGT07] showed that, for the class of (incrementally globally) asymptotically stable nonlinear control systems, symbolic models exist which are This work has been partially supported by the National Science Foundation CAREER award 0717188.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic idea is that incremental stability of can be equivalently described in terms of gain stability of a new system (referred to as a "supersystem" in [40]) consisting of two copies of driven in parallel by two different inputs and initial conditions. Indeed, let be a deterministic finite state machine defined by (15) and (16) (29) and output function defined by (30) Thus, is described by the following state transition (31) and output (32) equations:…”
Section: Incremental Stability Of Dfm Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to these approaches, the abstractions we build are valid for an infinite time-horizon. In [12], a similar technique is proposed to build finite abstractions for stabilizable linear systems, however only a one-sided approximation result is provided making these abstractions suitable for control synthesis but not for verification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%