2007
DOI: 10.1088/0253-6102/47/5/013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetries of Energy-Momentum Tensor: Some Basic Facts

Abstract: It has been pointed by Hall et al. [1] that matter collinations can be defined by using three different methods. But there arises the question of whether one studies matter collineations by using theThese alternative conditions are, of course, not generally equivalent. This problem has been explored by applying these three definitions to general static spherically symmetric spacetimes. We compare the results with each definition.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2007, Sharif and Ismaeel [19] classified spherically symmetric spacetimes via MCs in three different ways by considering the energy-momentum tensor in the covariant (T ab ), contravariant (T ab ) and mixed (T a b ) forms. The authors compared their results of these three cases and proved that they are not equivalent in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, Sharif and Ismaeel [19] classified spherically symmetric spacetimes via MCs in three different ways by considering the energy-momentum tensor in the covariant (T ab ), contravariant (T ab ) and mixed (T a b ) forms. The authors compared their results of these three cases and proved that they are not equivalent in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%