2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic IL-10 induction by LPS and the ceramide-1-phosphate analog PCERA-1 is mediated by the cAMP and p38 MAP kinase pathways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 There is a global phosphorylation increase in the Injury compared with the Sham group (Figure 2a), which is in line with the notion that inflammatory and/or ischemic insults activate PKA/PKC signaling. [34][35][36] Importantly, we detected a further increase in phosphorylation in the Injury+sPIF compared with the Injury group, suggesting possible modulation of PKA/PKC signaling by sPIF. 35 Thus, we reasoned that sPIF might enhance the phosphorylation of neuroprotective PKA/PKC substrates and therefore decided to test the phosphorylation status of BADSer112, GAP-43Ser41 and CREBSer133.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33 There is a global phosphorylation increase in the Injury compared with the Sham group (Figure 2a), which is in line with the notion that inflammatory and/or ischemic insults activate PKA/PKC signaling. [34][35][36] Importantly, we detected a further increase in phosphorylation in the Injury+sPIF compared with the Injury group, suggesting possible modulation of PKA/PKC signaling by sPIF. 35 Thus, we reasoned that sPIF might enhance the phosphorylation of neuroprotective PKA/PKC substrates and therefore decided to test the phosphorylation status of BADSer112, GAP-43Ser41 and CREBSer133.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The divergent in vivo effects of sPIF (neuroprotection, Figure 1) and LPS-induced neuroinflammation 24 suggest association/synergism with distinct cofactors of TLR4 signaling. 35 Thus, it is conceivable that cofactors of sPIF likely act in concert to elicit/synergize downstream effects that are specific to sPIF but different from those induced by LPS. In addition, studies to determine in vivo effects of TLR4 silencing will be needed to firmly establish the role of TLR4 in sPIF-mediated neuroprotection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism describing how the IL-10 gene is activated in Mo-M with a proinflammatory phenotype has been under intense investigation. One explanation is that a nonclassical NF-kB activity (p50-or p52-homodimer formation) induces IL-10 transcription together with certain transcription factors (e.g., cAMP-induced CREB activity) (39). Wnt5a induces cAMP and CREB activa- tion (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incubation of RAW264.7 macrophages with PCERA-1 leads to a rapid increase in intra-cellular cAMP level (Goldsmith et al, 2008) and subsequent phosphorylation of CREB (Avni and Zor, unpublished). Moreover, a PKA inhibitor blocked the effect of PCERA-1 on IL-10 ( Goldsmith et al, 2009) and TNF (Avni and Zor, unpublished) production. PCERA-1 also increases phosphorylation, and hence activation, of p38 MAP kinase, both in resting macrophages and in LPS-stimulated macrophages .…”
Section: The Receptor-mediated Activities Of Pcera-1mentioning
confidence: 97%