2005
DOI: 10.1002/0471741426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of Arithmetic Circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A carry save adder consists of a carry save stage and a final ripple carry stage that adds (or subtracts) the sum (or difference) and the carry (or borrow) bits [20]. The performance of the adder is limited by the ripple carry stage that accounts for the major portion of the delay in the circuit.…”
Section: Proposed Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A carry save adder consists of a carry save stage and a final ripple carry stage that adds (or subtracts) the sum (or difference) and the carry (or borrow) bits [20]. The performance of the adder is limited by the ripple carry stage that accounts for the major portion of the delay in the circuit.…”
Section: Proposed Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding cell for a n-bit binary adder is shown in Figure 4 Figure 4: Binary adder cell. [8,9]. One restricts to 10's complement system to cope with the needs of this paper.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For B = 10, the classic and naïve approach [8] of ripple-carry for a BCD decimal adder cell can be implemented as in Figure 5. Observe that the critical path involves the carry propagation through 7 binary adders plus a 4-bit Boolean circuit (checking if the sum s is greater than 9 or not).…”
Section: Base-10mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This field has been the subject of many investigations in order to implement various algorithms, such as Newton Raphson, SRT-Redundant, Non Redundant, Restoring and Non-Restoring (Kabuo et al, 1994;Birman et al, 1990; Bannur and Verma, 1985;Harris et al, 1997; Sorkin, 2006;Deschamps, 2006). The Non-Restoring algorithms, for division and square root extraction, are considered as a better compromise in terms of complexity and precision (Li and Chu, 1997; Diromsopa et al, 2001 ;Mamane et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%