2001
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1234:saohsf>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Adjustments of Hydrographic Sections for Internal Consistency*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
96
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crossover and inversion analysis (Gouretski and Jancke, 2001;Johnson et al, 2001) used to evaluate the consistency of the Nordic Seas nutrients data, was carried out using the version of the cnaX routines (Tanhua et al, 2010c) described by (Olsen et al, 2009). Briefly, the crossover points were found by identifying all station pairs, from different cruises, within 300 km from each other.…”
Section: Crossover and Inversion Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The crossover and inversion analysis (Gouretski and Jancke, 2001;Johnson et al, 2001) used to evaluate the consistency of the Nordic Seas nutrients data, was carried out using the version of the cnaX routines (Tanhua et al, 2010c) described by (Olsen et al, 2009). Briefly, the crossover points were found by identifying all station pairs, from different cruises, within 300 km from each other.…”
Section: Crossover and Inversion Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also note that whereas the crossover analysis is normally carried out using temperature or density as ordinate, depth was used in the Nordic Seas because of the small gradients of both temperature and density in this region. The offsets and uncertainties from all cruises were used to generate the set of corrections that maximized the consistency between the cruises using a least square model inversion, the weighted least square (WLSQ) inversion of (Johnson et al, 2001), which weights each crossover offset by its standard deviation so that offsets with large uncertainty are less influential than crossovers with small uncertainty. The data from 32L919920715, OMEX1NS and Iceland Sea time series were not included in this analysis because of lack of samples from deeper than 1900 dbar.…”
Section: Crossover and Inversion Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus each cruise gets a set of offsets compared to the other cruises. This set of offsets are then inverted using the Weighted Least Squares (WLSQ) approach of Johnson et al (2001) to find the corrections which maximizes the consistency of the data from the different cruises.…”
Section: Consistency Analysesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The consistency analysis was carried out using the crossover and inversion approach (Gouretski and Jancke, 2001;Johnson et al, 2001;Tanhua et al, 2009b), customised as described by Olsen et al (2009). Another possible approach would be multiparameter linear regressions (MLRs), similar to Wanninkhof et al (2003), however, at the time of our analyses the consistency of the nutrient data had not been evaluated and since any inconsistencies would propagate into the MLRs, this method was not used.…”
Section: Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation