2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic evaluation of biomarker stability in pilot scale sewer pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the load that enters the sewer system may differ from the load sampled (93). In planning this study, we avoided measuring biomarkers known to transform rapidly in sewer systems such as paracetamol (94). The extent of in-sewer transformation is catchment-specific and is not known for all chemicals tested in this study, in some cases due to the novel nature of their application.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the load that enters the sewer system may differ from the load sampled (93). In planning this study, we avoided measuring biomarkers known to transform rapidly in sewer systems such as paracetamol (94). The extent of in-sewer transformation is catchment-specific and is not known for all chemicals tested in this study, in some cases due to the novel nature of their application.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] In order to improve the accuracy of back-estimation, researches have been widely conducted to address the uncertainties associated with sampling method and chemical analysis, [5][6][7][8][9] while a comprehensive understanding of biomarkers stability in real sewers is still ongoing. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Biomarkers are subjected to physiochemical and biological processes during their transport in rising main and gravity sewer pipes, where the hydraulic retention time (HRT) may last for hours. 18 Neglecting the biomarkers transformation (e.g., the degradation or formation in sewers) will lead to an under-or over-estimation of drug consumption in a catchment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Depending on the different experimental scales and conditions utilized, research on biomarker stability can be divided into four categories: 1) in-water study using clean/sterile bottles or other containers where abiotic processes such as chemical hydrolysis occur in water; 14,20,21 2) in-wastewater study that is conducted in raw wastewater where suspended biomass and certain microbial activities contribute to the transformation process; 12,14,[21][22][23][24][25] 3) sewer reactor study employing lab reactors with intact/suspended biofilms or activated sludge to mimic the biologically active sewer environments; 10-12, 14, 16, 4) real sewer pipe study using the sewer pipes with the same (or similar) size and operational conditions as the real sewer networks. 10,15,17,26,27 Among the real sewer pipe studies, two of them assessed the change of biomarkers using 24-h composite samples, however, with limited understanding of the concurrent in-pipe hydraulics or biological activities. 15,26 Two other studies spiked biomarkers in a real rising main pipe and evaluated their variations from the pipe upstream to a downstream sampling point, coupled with the measurements of flow dynamics and biological activities in the pipe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The in-sewer fate of MPs that are investigated in this thesis has been presented in 27 . The MPs such as fexofenadine, venlafaxine, codeine, atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide, hydroxycotinine and cotinine were reported to be stable in lab sewer reactors or in the pilot rising main sewer 160,162 . In the real sewer system, cotinine, hydroxycotinine and sulfamethoxazole were reported to have negative removal 30,161 .…”
Section: Fate Of Organic Mps In the Sewer Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%