2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic evaluation of the early access applied biosystems precision ID Globalfiler mixture ID and Globalfiler NGS STR panels for the ion S5 system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and S1). In general, results for the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit aSTR sensitivity were comparable to CE-based STR kits [58][59][60][61] and in line with earlier published MPS studies [1,3,4,14,54].…”
Section: Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2 and S1). In general, results for the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit aSTR sensitivity were comparable to CE-based STR kits [58][59][60][61] and in line with earlier published MPS studies [1,3,4,14,54].…”
Section: Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In line with these findings for the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit, Müller et al, 2018 [4] observed comparable results for TH01 and D19S443 evaluating both Globalfiler MPS-kits (i.e. the Early Access Applied Biosystems Precision ID Globalfiler Mixture ID and the Globalfiler NGS STR Panels) on the Ion S5 instrument [4]. Although using a centrally prepared sequencing library we observed locus coverage variation for single source samples sequenced on the eight MiSeq FGx sequencers (Tables 1 and S5).…”
Section: Locus Coveragementioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations