Systematic Literature Review and Model for Older Driver Safety

Classen, Sherrilene; Garvan, Cynthia Wilson; Awadzi, Kezia D.; Sundaram, Swathy; Winter, Sandra; López, Ellen D. S.; Ferree, Nita

doi:10.1097/00013614-200604000-00001

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The PPMHP domains address safety influences on the level of the driver (e.g., knowledge, behavior, attitudes, health status; Awadzi et al, 2008; Classen et al, 2006, 2007), the vehicle (e.g., safety features or equipment; Awadzi et al, 2008; Classen et al, 2007), the physical and political environment (e.g., daytime conditions, state licensing policies; Awadzi et al, 2008; Classen et al, 2007), the social environment (e.g., driving laws, assistance with transportation; Classen, Winter, & Lopez, 2009), and person–vehicle–environment interactions (Classen, Awadzi, & Mkanta, 2008). Collectively, our research has demonstrated that behavioral and environmental factors are understudied yet important determinants for older driver safety and that a comprehensive assessment must include person, vehicle, and environmental factors, as well as the interactions among these factors (Classen et al, 2007, 2008).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Item Development and Validity Testing for a Self- and Proxy Report: The Safe Driving Behavior Measure

Classen

Winter

Velozo

et al. 2010

The American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE We report on item development and validity testing of a self-report older adult safe driving behaviors measure (SDBM). METHOD On the basis of theoretical frameworks (Precede–Proceed Model of Health Promotion, Haddon’s matrix, and Michon’s model), existing driving measures, and previous research and guided by measurement theory, we developed items capturing safe driving behavior. Item development was further informed by focus groups. We established face validity using peer reviewers and content validity using expert raters. RESULTS Peer review indicated acceptable face validity. Initial expert rater review yielded a scale content validity index (CVI) rating of 0.78, with 44 of 60 items rated ≥0.75. Sixteen unacceptable items (≤0.5) required major revision or deletion. The next CVI scale average was 0.84, indicating acceptable content validity. CONCLUSION The SDBM has relevance as a self-report to rate older drivers. Future pilot testing of the SDBM comparing results with on-road testing will define criterion validity.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Item Development and Validity Testing for a Self- and Proxy Report: The Safe Driving Behavior Measure

Classen

Winter

Velozo

et al. 2010

The American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 Older adults often have physical and sensory impairments that result in everyday tasks being more difficult, demanding, or dangerous than for younger adults. 2 Of concern is the potential for significant injuries and crashes involving older drivers, as a danger to themselves and to other road users, given that older drivers have among the highest crash rates per distance driven 3 and relatively high injury and mortality rates. 4 Not all older drivers have impaired driving performance or high crash risk.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The On‐Road Difficulties of Older Drivers and Their Relationship with Self‐Reported Motor Vehicle Crashes

Wood

Anstey

Lacherez

et al. 2009

J American Geriatrics Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An expert multidisciplinary team (Classen et al, 2006) produced this scoping review using the PROSPERO, the JBI Reviewer’s Manual , and PRISMA guidelines. The research team employed multiple strategies to mitigate effects of bias and an iterative process to develop search criteria, complete extraction, and present the findings.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smart In-Vehicle Technologies and Older Drivers: A Scoping Review

Classen

Jeghers

Morgan-Daniel

et al. 2019

OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In-vehicle technologies may decrease crash risk in drivers with age-related declines. Researchers determined the impact of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) or advanced driving assistance systems (ADAS) on driving. Through a scoping review, the effect of IVIS or ADAS on older drivers' convenience (i.e., meets one's needs), comfort (i.e., physical or psychological ease), or safety (i.e., absence of errors or crashes) was examined. Researchers synopsized findings from 28 studies, including driving simulators and on-road environments. Findings indicated that IVIS or ADAS enhanced safety and mitigated age-related declines. Notably, IVIS may reduce cognitive workload, but may jeopardize safety if the systems are overly complicated. The ADAS enhanced safety and comfort by increasing speed control, lane maintenance, and braking responses. However, no studies addressed convenience. In-vehicle technologies may enhance safety and comfort while driving, if one's cognitive workload is not compromised. Naturalistic studies are needed to elucidate the risks and benefits of IVIS and ADAS for older drivers.

show abstract

Systematic Literature Review and Model for Older Driver Safety

Cited by 11 publications

References 10 publications

Item Development and Validity Testing for a Self- and Proxy Report: The Safe Driving Behavior Measure

Item Development and Validity Testing for a Self- and Proxy Report: The Safe Driving Behavior Measure

The On‐Road Difficulties of Older Drivers and Their Relationship with Self‐Reported Motor Vehicle Crashes

Smart In-Vehicle Technologies and Older Drivers: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About