2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic reviews identify important methodological flaws in stroke rehabilitation therapy primary studies: review of reviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An adaptation from Oxman and Guyatt [33] and Santaguida et al [46] were implemented for scoring these items. We introduced a full score of 100 points to cover this study which is discriminated as follows: 10, obligatory conditions to be assessed from the area under curve; 5, mandatory variables in the study of neural signals, and 0, no information on the items to be evaluated was provided.…”
Section: The Quasi Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adaptation from Oxman and Guyatt [33] and Santaguida et al [46] were implemented for scoring these items. We introduced a full score of 100 points to cover this study which is discriminated as follows: 10, obligatory conditions to be assessed from the area under curve; 5, mandatory variables in the study of neural signals, and 0, no information on the items to be evaluated was provided.…”
Section: The Quasi Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological flaws of the reviews, in particular non-Cochrane reviews, were identified. (16) The methodological quality of systematic reviews about acupuncture for stroke patients has not been evaluated so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive review of the literature on FES clinical trials revealed that the majority of research groups used walking speed as the outcome measure to evaluate the efficacy of FES [2]. Additional outcomes used were the Modified Ashworth Scale, FugleMeyer Assessment score, and range of motion [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%