1993
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(93)95850-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic study of proton-induced L-shell ionization for 46 ≤ Z ≤ 70 elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the corrections already introduced in the classical ECPSSR model of Brandt andLapicki (1979, 1981), i.e. energy loss, Coulomb deflection, binding and relativistic corrections, a modified treatment of the binding correction, corresponding to a united-atom approximation (ECPSSR-UA), suggested by our group (Vigilante et al 1990) and an extension of the relativistic calculations of Crasemann (1985, 1989), based on DHS wavefunctions, to heavy targets and for various projectiles (De Cesare et al 1993, leading at the end to the values of the cross sections labelled DHS-UA, were used. Recently, our group has proposed a Coulomb correction more sophisticated than the one generally used in the ECPSSR model.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the corrections already introduced in the classical ECPSSR model of Brandt andLapicki (1979, 1981), i.e. energy loss, Coulomb deflection, binding and relativistic corrections, a modified treatment of the binding correction, corresponding to a united-atom approximation (ECPSSR-UA), suggested by our group (Vigilante et al 1990) and an extension of the relativistic calculations of Crasemann (1985, 1989), based on DHS wavefunctions, to heavy targets and for various projectiles (De Cesare et al 1993, leading at the end to the values of the cross sections labelled DHS-UA, were used. Recently, our group has proposed a Coulomb correction more sophisticated than the one generally used in the ECPSSR model.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very large ratios still present for the L 2 -subshell, also observed for other kinds of projectiles, have been attributed to vacancy rearrangement effects in the collision (Sarkadi and Mukoyama 1984). However, our analysis on 46 Z 2 70 elements (De Cesare et al 1993, 1994 has shown that the introduction of these effects through the two-step model of Sarkadi and Mukoyama (1984) leads throughout to slight improvements, although insufficient to reproduce the experimental findings. A similar remark has been made by Jitschin et al (1983) in their analysis of ionization cross section ratios for gold, which are very different from the predicted values, even when introducing intra-shell effects.…”
Section: Cross Section Valuesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Recently, our group has proposed a simple way to extend the relativistic calculations of Crasemann (1985, 1989), based on Dirac-Hartree-Slater (DHS) wavefunctions, to all the targets with 40 Z 2 85 at all the incident energies between 0.15 and 3.0 MeV and for all the incident ions (with Z 1 Z 2 ), as well as a way to introduce in these calculations the UA approximation (De Cesare et al 1993, 1994, leading in the end to ((E)RPWBA-BC-UA-DHS) values of the cross sections (in the following DHS-UA).…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%