1984
DOI: 10.1109/tc.1984.1676441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systolic Multipliers for Finite Fields GF(2m)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, efficient multipliers are important from a system performance point of view. Although several multipliers have been developed with a polynomial basis of GFð2 m Þ, their high space and time complexities are major limitations in cryptographic applications [1,2,3,4]. Thus, further research on efficient multiplication architectures with low space and time complexities is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, efficient multipliers are important from a system performance point of view. Although several multipliers have been developed with a polynomial basis of GFð2 m Þ, their high space and time complexities are major limitations in cryptographic applications [1,2,3,4]. Thus, further research on efficient multiplication architectures with low space and time complexities is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One implementation is LSB-first multiplication based on (1), the other is most significant bit (MSB)-first multiplication based on (2). In this letter, we construct a low complexity systolic multiplier/squarer using the LSB first scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of the algorithms used to implement multipliers include the LSB-first multiplication algorithm [5], MSB-first multiplication algorithm [6], and Montgomery algorithm [7]. Previous research and development on modular multiplication is as follows: First, for a one-dimensional systolic array, in the case of an LSB-first algorithm, the modular multiplication is performed within 3m clock cycles using m cells [5]. While in the case of an MSB-first algorithm, the modular multiplication can be performed within 3m clock cycles using m cells [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an LFSR structure, the modular multiplication can be performed within 2m clock cycles using m cells [10], the modular multiplication can be performed within m clock cycles using m cells and the modular squaring can be performed within m clock cycles using m cells [11]. The structures proposed in [5,6,10,12] are simple modular multipliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation