1974
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(74)89126-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T1 Spin decoupling effects on the lineshapes of NMR spin—spin multiplets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that no 31 P− 1 H coupling is visible (recall the large ∼35 Hz splitting for the hydride triplet of 2j + ). Such apparent decoupling, known as T 1 spin decoupling, was quantitatively described nearly 35 years ago, but relatively few unambiguous examples have since appeared in the literature. The hydride resonance of 2j + / 2i can be described as the A subsystem of an AX 2 system, where X 2 are in close proximity to a metal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that no 31 P− 1 H coupling is visible (recall the large ∼35 Hz splitting for the hydride triplet of 2j + ). Such apparent decoupling, known as T 1 spin decoupling, was quantitatively described nearly 35 years ago, but relatively few unambiguous examples have since appeared in the literature. The hydride resonance of 2j + / 2i can be described as the A subsystem of an AX 2 system, where X 2 are in close proximity to a metal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Hz for such a group. However, the signal is somewhat broad, and a short Tt of the coupled CH could induce an apparent reduction of the splitting on the methyl group (Navon & Polak, 1974). The complete identification of methyl resonances was achieved also for PSTI II, whose spectrum is shown in Figure 4B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As a further check a 4.5-atm 02 broadened spectrum of the aliphatic residue of p-diethoxybenzene is compared in Figure 1 with a spectrum computed as described before. 16 The agreement seems satisfactory. Accordingly, the apparent reduction of J is fully explained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%