Taking a Disagreeing Perspective Improves the Accuracy of People’s Quantitative Estimates

Calseyde, Philippe van de; Efendic, Emir

doi:10.1177/09567976211061321

Cited by 8 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Specifically, they first answer their own estimate and then create another estimate from the perspective of someone with whom they disagree (hereafter called “disagree-other”). Thus, we obtain four methods that exploit the wisdom of the inner crowd: (1) providing a timespan 14 ; (2) dialectical bootstrapping 15 ; (3) disagree-other 16 ; and our method (Strictly, Winkler, and Clemen 51 also suggested another intervention type).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As mentioned in the Introduction, a new promising method 16 that exploits the wisdom of the inner crowd has recently been proposed. This method requires participants to produce two estimates for a single question.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Meanwhile, there are several differences between the two methods. First, the disagree-other method 16 makes participants take an individual’s perspective, while our method makes participants simulate the crowd’s perspective. Second, the disagree-other method makes participants take someone’s perspective, who probably has a different opinion from their own estimates.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the wisdom of the crowds also has a fundamental problem in that it is difficult to gather estimates from many people 12 , 13 . To solve this problem, previous studies 14 , 15 proposed methods that exploited the wisdom of the crowds within-person (hereafter, “the wisdom of the inner crowd” 16 – 20 ). In such approach, an individual is asked to produce two different estimates in response to a single question, in place of two people’s estimates.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on these two methods, many studies over the last decade 16 – 28 have examined the wisdom of the inner crowd. However, except for Calseyde & Efendić (2022)’s promising approach 16 , nothing other than the above two methods has been proposed (see the “ Discussion ” section for more details). As we discuss below, these existing methods leave room for improvements in efficacy and response time.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

On an effective and efficient method for exploiting the wisdom of the inner crowd

Fujisaki

Yang

Ueda

2023

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Researchers have shown that even an individual can produce the wisdom of the crowds, called “the wisdom of the inner crowd.” However, the previous methods leave room for improvements in terms of efficacy and response time. This paper proposes a more efficient method, which required a short time, based on findings from cognitive and social psychology. The procedure is to ask participants to give two answers to the same question: first, their own estimate and, second, their estimate of public opinion. Experiments using this method showed that the averages of the two estimates were more accurate than the participants’ first estimates. That is, the wisdom of the inner crowd elicited. In addition, we found that the method could be superior to other methods in terms of efficacy and convenience. Moreover, we identified the conditions where our method worked better. We further clarify the availability and limitations of using the wisdom of the inner crowd. Overall, this paper proposes an effective and short-time method for harvesting the wisdom of the inner crowd.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

On an effective and efficient method for exploiting the wisdom of the inner crowd

Fujisaki

Yang

Ueda

2023

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Wisdom of the inner crowd benefits both face and voice matching

Kramer,

Flanagan,

Jones

et al. 2023

Applied Cognitive Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Identification often involves determining whether two face photographs or voice samples originated from the same person. Here, we investigated the wisdom of the (outer) crowd (averaging two individuals' responses to the same trial) and inner crowd (averaging the same individual's responses to the same trial after completing the test twice) as routes to increased performance. Participants completed the same face (Experiment 1) or voice matching test (Experiment 2) twice with no delay. In addition, we reanalysed previously collected data where these tests were completed with a one‐week interval between sessions. For both tests, whether with or without a delay, inner crowds outperformed participants' individual test responses and were equivalent to outer crowds of two participants. Taken together, we demonstrate the use of inner crowds as a robust method of improvement during identification. In contexts where outer crowds are not feasible, agencies should consider inner crowds as a promising alternative.

show abstract

Does EMA implementation promote green innovation? The mediation effects of both cross‐functional coopetition and supplier co‐creation

Xu,

Cheah,

Hair

et al. 2024

Bus Strat Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The call for green innovation necessitates the creation of an ecosystem that is friendly to the environment. Certain environmental regulations and standards are put in place to foster this type of innovation. However, there are many literature debates on the impact of guidelines and management controls on green innovation. Drawing on both the resource‐based view (RBV) and dynamic capability theory (DCT), this study investigates the impact of environmental management accounting (EMA) implementation on green process and product innovation, considering the mediating effects of cross‐functional coopetition and supplier co‐creation. Multi‐wave surveys were conducted across 799 Chinese companies. The results show that EMA implementation has a positive effect on both cross‐functional coopetition and co‐creation. In addition, cross‐functional coopetition serves to mediate the relationship between EMA implementation and both green process and product innovation. However, it should be noted that supplier co‐creation only serves to mediate the relationship between EMA implementation and green process innovation, rather than green product innovation. Overall, this research adds to the RBV literature by offering a fresh perspective on the role of cross‐functional coopetition in situations where resources are shared and conflicts occur simultaneously. Furthermore, the study enhances our understanding of DCT by examining the role of supplier co‐creation. This research delves into how companies balance resource availability with environmental adaptability, striking a balance between replication and renewal.

show abstract

Taking a Disagreeing Perspective Improves the Accuracy of People’s Quantitative Estimates

Cited by 8 publications

References 56 publications

On an effective and efficient method for exploiting the wisdom of the inner crowd

On an effective and efficient method for exploiting the wisdom of the inner crowd

Wisdom of the inner crowd benefits both face and voice matching

Does EMA implementation promote green innovation? The mediation effects of both cross‐functional coopetition and supplier co‐creation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About