2014
DOI: 10.1128/aac.02578-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Short Salt-Resistant Synthetic Peptides

Abstract: bThe seriousness of microbial resistance combined with the lack of new antimicrobials has increased interest in the development of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as novel therapeutics. In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activities of two short synthetic peptides, namely, RRIKA and RR. These peptides exhibited potent antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, and their antimicrobial effects were significantly enhanced by addition of three amino acids in the C terminus, which consequently in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the inflammatory response after bacterial infection contributes to the clinical severity of S . aureus skin infection rather than the bacterial burden (Mohamed et al ., ). We could previously demonstrate a strong anti‐inflammatory effect of Pep19‐2.5 against pathogenicity factors of Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria in skin cells (Pfalzgraff et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the inflammatory response after bacterial infection contributes to the clinical severity of S . aureus skin infection rather than the bacterial burden (Mohamed et al ., ). We could previously demonstrate a strong anti‐inflammatory effect of Pep19‐2.5 against pathogenicity factors of Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria in skin cells (Pfalzgraff et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, skin infections caused by S. aureus or P. aeruginosa frequently lead to invasive infections that might result in sepsis (Thangamani et al, 2015;Guillamet and Kollef, 2016). Notably, the inflammatory response after bacterial infection contributes to the clinical severity of S. aureus skin infection rather than the bacterial burden (Mohamed et al, 2014). We could previously demonstrate a strong anti-inflammatory effect of Pep19-2.5 against pathogenicity factors of Gram-positive and Gramnegative bacteria in skin cells .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The microtiter dish biofilm formation assay 24 was utilized to assess the ability of the thiazole compounds to disrupt an adherent staphylococcal biofilm, similar to what has been described elsewhere 25 . S. epidermidis ATCC 35984 was transferred to tryptic soy broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 h before being diluted 1:200 in tryptic soy broth + 1% glucose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the MIC 90 of IP ranged from 1 to 8 ÎŒg ml − 1 in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, MRSA, VISA and VRSA strains, and were as well or better than those of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide RRIKA (2-4 ÎŒg ml − 1 ) and the peptidomimetics LTX-109 (2-4 ÎŒg ml − 1 ), previously reported as a new class of drugs with activity against VISA and VRSA strains. 19,20 Also, IP exhibited the most potent anti-S. aureus activity among the tick antimicrobial peptides evaluated in the present study. Although VISA strain Mu50 appeared to be resistant to the action of IP on cell membrane, the MIC 90 of IP was lower than that of Nisin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The activity was as good or better than those of vancomycin and other published antimicrobial peptides. [14][15][16][17]19,20 Although, host cytotoxicity and instability in vivo are major limitations of antimicrobial peptides in their application as antimicrobial drugs, we have reported recently that IP lacked toxicity to mammalian and human cells such as fibroblasts, colon epithelial cells and erythrocytes, and built a stable structure unlike other antimicrobial peptides. 12 Thus, IP combines the most important three advantages for clinical setting, which are potent bactericidal activity, low toxicity and structural stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%