2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targets for intervention to prevent substance use in young people exposed to childhood adversity: A systematic review

Abstract: Background and aims Childhood adversity is a strong, and concerningly prevalent, risk factor for the later development of substance misuse. Yet despite substantial accumulating evidence for causal mechanisms, there has been little attempt to synthesize the strength of the evidence. Importantly, these mechanisms may be amenable to intervention, providing targets for substance use prevention among those exposed to childhood adversity. The present review aimed to systematically identify mediating and moderating m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(193 reference statements)
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One systematic review examined social factors as mediating or moderating the relationship between ACEs and substance misuse. 23 ACE exposure was found to be associated with increased substance misuse through lower educational opportunity and achievement and involvement with the justice system. 23 Moreover, living in a neighborhood characterized by greater trust and social cohesion reduced the association between ACEs and alcohol misuse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One systematic review examined social factors as mediating or moderating the relationship between ACEs and substance misuse. 23 ACE exposure was found to be associated with increased substance misuse through lower educational opportunity and achievement and involvement with the justice system. 23 Moreover, living in a neighborhood characterized by greater trust and social cohesion reduced the association between ACEs and alcohol misuse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“… Mean age: 34–42 579 ACEs were positively associated with problem substance use and earlier age of initiation. Grummitt et al 2021a 23 PA, SA, EA, EN, PN, DV, household SU, household MI, household incarceration, PS Substance misuse, SUD, SU dependence, age of SU initiation Youth with SU outcome measured ≤ age 24 Longitudinal studies only 59,798 Found the relationship between ACEs and substance misuse was mediated by anger, coping motives, posttraumatic stress symptoms, externalizing behavior, peer relationships, mother-child relationship, school mobility, and educational achievement. The link between ACEs and substance misuse was moderated by depressive symptoms, religiosity, future orientation, family cohesion and quality of relationships.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study builds on previous literature by focusing more specifically on mediation of physical health outcomes. However, substance use is often a coping mechanism for trauma [ 63 ] and frequently begins in childhood or adolescence [ 20 ]; this may complicate the timing of trauma-informed interventions to prevent this pathway, which are most successful before substance use becomes chronic [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing evidence shows an association between early life stress and adversity and heightened risk for developing SUDs in adolescence (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), which is a critical window for initiation, experimentation, and establishment of more regular patterns of substance use (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). A substantial proportion of the relationship between childhood adversity and substance use in adolescence is mediated through individual, interpersonal and community factors (33,34). Evidence suggests that associations between cumulative stressors and adolescent substance use are moderated or mediated by genetic factors (e.g., related to cortisol regulation) (21,35,36), intrapersonal factors (e.g., executive cognitive function, self-esteem, impulsive behavior, inhibitory control, temperament) (37)(38)(39)(40)(41), or interpersonal factors (e.g., household and peer influences) (42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%