“…During the CTI, ERPs robustly show a switch‐positivity, a larger cue‐locked centroparietal positivity for switch trials than mixed‐repeat trials (Barcelo, Escera, Corral, & Perianez, 2006; Finke, Escera, & Barcelo, 2012; Jost, Mayr, & Rosler, 2008; Karayanidis et al, 2009; Karayanidis, Coltheart, Michie, & Murphy, 2003; Nicholson, Karayanidis, Poboka, Heathcote, & Michie, 2005). Time‐frequency analyses show that, over a similar time window, switch trials elicit higher power over frontal and parietal sites in theta (Cooper, Darriba, Karayanidis, & Barcelo, 2016; Cooper, Wong, McKewen, Michie, & Karayanidis, 2017; Cunillera et al, 2012; McKewen et al, 2020), alpha (8–13 Hz; Cooper et al, 2016; Foxe, Murphy, & De Sanctis, 2014; Mansfield, Karayanidis, & Cohen, 2012), and delta (~0.5–4 Hz; Prada, Barcelo, Herrmann, & Escera, 2014) bands compared to mixed‐repeat trials. Additionally, compared to all‐repeat trials, mixed‐repeat trials elicit a larger cue‐locked centroparietal positivity, the mixing‐positivity (Jost et al, 2008; Manzi, Nessler, Czernochowski, & Friedman, 2011; Whitson et al, 2014) and higher cue‐locked frontal and parietal theta (Cooper et al, 2017) and alpha (McKewen et al, 2020) power.…”