2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax payment default prediction using genetic algorithm-based variable selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
21
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Articles where loan default (or a proxy of it) is used as the dependent variable or articles where the failure prediction model has incorporated non-financial variables have been summarized in Appendix A Table A1. A1 have analysed default prediction based on different nonfinancial information, such as firm age (Altman et al 2010(Altman et al , 2017Back 2005;Bhimani et al 2013); firm size (Altman et al 2010(Altman et al , 2017Back 2005;Bhimani et al 2013); industrial sector (Altman et al 2010(Altman et al , 2017Bhimani et al 2013;Höglund 2017;Laitinen 2011); management characteristics (Back 2005;Bhimani et al 2013;Ciampi 2015;Laitinen 2011); previous payment history (Back 2005;Ciampi et al 2020;Laitinen 2011); corporate social responsibility (Ciampi 2018); tax arrears (Lukason and Andresson 2019); country of origin (Altman et al 2017); financial support from partners (Bhimani et al 2013); ownership of assets (Bhimani et al 2013); stock price volatility (Atiya 2001); audit information (Altman et al 2010); late filing of reports (Altman et al 2010); and country court judgement (Altman et al 2010).…”
Section: Financial and Non-financial Variables For Firm Failure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles where loan default (or a proxy of it) is used as the dependent variable or articles where the failure prediction model has incorporated non-financial variables have been summarized in Appendix A Table A1. A1 have analysed default prediction based on different nonfinancial information, such as firm age (Altman et al 2010(Altman et al , 2017Back 2005;Bhimani et al 2013); firm size (Altman et al 2010(Altman et al , 2017Back 2005;Bhimani et al 2013); industrial sector (Altman et al 2010(Altman et al , 2017Bhimani et al 2013;Höglund 2017;Laitinen 2011); management characteristics (Back 2005;Bhimani et al 2013;Ciampi 2015;Laitinen 2011); previous payment history (Back 2005;Ciampi et al 2020;Laitinen 2011); corporate social responsibility (Ciampi 2018); tax arrears (Lukason and Andresson 2019); country of origin (Altman et al 2017); financial support from partners (Bhimani et al 2013); ownership of assets (Bhimani et al 2013); stock price volatility (Atiya 2001); audit information (Altman et al 2010); late filing of reports (Altman et al 2010); and country court judgement (Altman et al 2010).…”
Section: Financial and Non-financial Variables For Firm Failure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al [39] develop multi-class financial misstatement detection models for discovering fraudulent activities. Höglund [40] proposes a genetic algorithm-based decision support tool for predicting tax payment defaults.…”
Section: B Data Mining and Machine Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the tax default status of firms is considered to be an even more challenging prediction task because it is characterized by the presence of sample selection bias due to the small number of labelled data (known as tax default cases) [4]. The indicators of credit default and corporate bankruptcy have been extensively studied in earlier research [5], [6], but the indicators of tax default are still poorly understood despite the fact that corporate tax documents contain much multifaceted information for assessing tax default risk prediction [7]. Predicting a tax default differs from predicting a tax evasion (tax fraud) [4], [8] or a tax avoidance [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed to model underspecification (only four financial indicators were used) and the presence of nonlinear relationships between the financial indicators and the firms' tax status, which could not be detected using the logistic regression (LR) model. A substantially improved classification accuracy was achieved when a large number of financial indicators were employed [7]. It must be noted that the aim of this earlier study was to investigate the importance of early-warning financial indicators rather than to develop an accurate tax default prediction system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%