“…As mentioned above, such a small energy difference of 1 CT, 3 CT, and 3 LE states has a great impact on the RISC process. However, the energy distribution of 1 CT and 3 CT states stemming from the conformational distribution of TADF molecules in immobile organic solid films or frozen solutions are not considered in many reports that cover the RISC process of TADF molecules. , Especially, the energy distribution of 3 CT states is rarely considered, while the energy distribution of 1 CT states is often considered by time-resolved spectra and transient photoluminescence (PL) decays. − In addition, 3 CT and 1 CT states are often considered degenerate states, assuming the orthogonal D–A structure of the TADF molecules. , Moreover, most of the reports determine the energy and configuration of T 1 states from a phosphorescence spectrum measured at a fixed temperature, delay time, and solvent. ,,, …”