2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher agency in professional development programmes – A case study of professional development material and collegial discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…La agencia está emergiendo como un concepto clave, presente en debates cada vez más intensos sobre la formación de los futuros formadores (Lipponen y Kumpulainen, 2011;Insulander et al, 2019). A pesar de su reconocida importancia, se han realizado pocos estudios empíricos, y solo algunos se han centrado explícitamente en la formación y la agencia de los docentes (Tao y Gao, 2017;Ukkonen-Mikkola y Varpanen, 2020).…”
Section: Formación Docente Inicial Tic Y Genciaunclassified
“…La agencia está emergiendo como un concepto clave, presente en debates cada vez más intensos sobre la formación de los futuros formadores (Lipponen y Kumpulainen, 2011;Insulander et al, 2019). A pesar de su reconocida importancia, se han realizado pocos estudios empíricos, y solo algunos se han centrado explícitamente en la formación y la agencia de los docentes (Tao y Gao, 2017;Ukkonen-Mikkola y Varpanen, 2020).…”
Section: Formación Docente Inicial Tic Y Genciaunclassified
“…In a previous study (Kaufmann & Ryve, 2019) we analyzed teachers' collegial discussions with the aim of theorizing about how the teachers' role was constructed collegially. These collegial discussions were part of a large professional development program for mathematics teachers (Boost for Mathematics, BfM, Insulander et al, 2019, Steenbrugge et al, 2018, and the analysis of the collegial discussions resulted in the identification of three main discourses within which teachers tended to navigate and position themselves. Three discourses emerged from the analysis of collegial discussion data: a traditional discourse, a reformoriented discourse (see, e.g., Kilpatrick et al, 2001;Munter et al, 2015;Valoyes-Chávez, 2019), and a democratic teacher role discourse.…”
Section: The Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…National evaluations (Österholm et al, 2016;Ramböll, 2016) and research studies (e.g., Boesen et al, 2015;Insulander et al, 2019;Lindvall et al, 2018;Van Steenbrugge et al, 2018) of BfM have been conducted, focusing on different aspects of its implementation or impacts on teachers, instruction, and students. Only two of these, however, have emphasized issues that are in focus in the present study: the impact of BfM on mathematics instruction (Österholm et al, 2016) and on student achievement (Lindvall et al, 2018).…”
Section: Previous Evaluations and Studies Of Boost For Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can function as a tool to allow teachers to focus on specific aspects of their practice instead of everything at once (Kazemi & Hubbard, 2008). In fact, two recent studies investigating how different PD materials from BfM supported teachers' negotiation of meaning around these resources (Insulander et al, 2019;Van Steenbrugge et al, 2018) indicate that more prescriptive materials (e.g., suggesting certain teacher actions) supported teachers' participation around central didactical ideas in the collegial discussions to a higher extent than did materials that rely on teachers drawing on their previous knowledge and making independent judgements. This supports Grossman and McDonald's (2008) call for increased levels of pedagogies of enactment.…”
Section: The Professional Development Program's Designmentioning
confidence: 99%