2021
DOI: 10.1177/0010414021997498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Team and Nation: Sports, Nationalism, and Attitudes Toward Refugees

Abstract: How do major national events influence attitudes toward non-nationals? Recent research suggests that national sports team wins help foster national pride, weaken ethnic attachments, and build trust among conational out-group members. This paper asks a related question: By heightening nationalism, do these victories also affect attitudes toward foreign out-groups, specifically refugees? We examine this question using the 2019 Africa Cup football match between Kenya and Tanzania, which Kenya narrowly won, couple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suggested mechanism by which emphasizing a narrower and more exclusive form of national identification exacerbates anti-immigrant attitudes implies that educational content that does not directly engage with anti-immigrant narratives can still have a significant negative impact on attitudes towards immigrants. This is in line with recent evidence showing an indirect influence of national identity on attitudes towards refugees (Rosenzweig and Zhou, 2020).…”
Section: Covariatessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The suggested mechanism by which emphasizing a narrower and more exclusive form of national identification exacerbates anti-immigrant attitudes implies that educational content that does not directly engage with anti-immigrant narratives can still have a significant negative impact on attitudes towards immigrants. This is in line with recent evidence showing an indirect influence of national identity on attitudes towards refugees (Rosenzweig and Zhou, 2020).…”
Section: Covariatessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, in Jordan and Colombia, Alrababa'h et al (2021) and Holland, Peters and Zhou (2021), respectively, find that citizens were more supportive of migrants when they are more vulnerable -women, families with children, widows, and those who are fleeing poverty and violence. Additionally, interventions emphasizing the merits of diversity or a supranational identity such as pan-Africanism (Rosenzweig and Zhou, 2021), and listening to refugees' personal narratives (Audette, Horowitz and Michelitch, 2020) in East Africa can reduce citizens' negative attitudes toward migrants. Yet, in these cases, there is evidence that respondents are instrumental: Jordanians preferred Syrian refugees who shared a similar sect of Islam (Alrababa'h et al, 2021), Colombians preferred Venezuelan migrants who shared a political ideology (Holland, Peters and Zhou, 2021), Tanzanians preferred Burundian refugees who shared their religion and could speak Tanzanian Kiswahili (Zhou, 2018).…”
Section: Who Deserves Entry?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exodus of Syrian refugees, as in the context of forced migration governance, shifted the attention of scholars to study the attitudes towards refugees (Alrababah et al 2020). There also exist 23 similar studies on host community members and Congolese refugees in Rwanda (Fajth et al 2019), Burmese refugee camp residents' social structures in Thailand (Bochmann 2018), Ivorian refugees in Liberia (Hartman and Morse 2020), and attitudes towards refugees in Sub-Saharan Africa (Rosenzweig and Zhou 2021). Yet, these studies focus either on the host community side or on the refugee side of the subject.…”
Section: Intergroup Encountersmentioning
confidence: 99%