2021
DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000676
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical Aspects of Flow Cytometry-based Measurable Residual Disease Quantification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Experience of the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party

Abstract: Measurable residual disease (MRD) quantified by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is a strong and independent prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, several technical factors may affect the final read-out of the assay. Experts from the MRD Working Party of the European LeukemiaNet evaluated which aspects are crucial for accurate MFC-MRD measurement. Here, we report on the agreement, obtained via a combination of a cross-sectional questionnaire, live discussions, and a Delphi poll. The re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While flow cytometry is highly applicable in more than 90% of AML cases [ 26 ], there is limited harmonization and standardization which may limit sensitivity and specificity in real-world settings [ 11 ]. Assessment of MRD at our centers utilized an eight-color Euroflow platform that incorporates the markers recommended in the recent ELN consensus document for MFC MRD assessment in AML [ 27 , 28 ]. Clinicians graded MRD using both LAIP and DfN approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While flow cytometry is highly applicable in more than 90% of AML cases [ 26 ], there is limited harmonization and standardization which may limit sensitivity and specificity in real-world settings [ 11 ]. Assessment of MRD at our centers utilized an eight-color Euroflow platform that incorporates the markers recommended in the recent ELN consensus document for MFC MRD assessment in AML [ 27 , 28 ]. Clinicians graded MRD using both LAIP and DfN approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FC is widely used in most haematological malignancies [106] and measures protein markers at the surface of individual malignant cells and often a fresh bone marrow sample is required. Immunophenotypic evaluation by multiparameter FC can detect one malignant cell in 10 3 –10 5 normal cells [107], as it uses a combination of leukaemic specific markers. The advantages of FC methods include its fast turnaround time, within 1 day, but it requires skilled pathologists and standardised procedures.…”
Section: How To Best Assess Treatment Response and Follow Longitudina...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with ELN, NCCN, and American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, most centers use a combination of methods—including bone marrow morphology, cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunophenotyping, and molecular studies—to optimize AML diagnostics and MRD technique sensitivity, specificity, and applicability [ 10 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Among these techniques, the most commonly used MRD detection tool is immunophenotyping with multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) [ 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. ELN guidelines provide guidance regarding flow cytometry settings, the recommended panel of cell population identifiers, and gating strategy [ 22 ].…”
Section: Mrd Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these techniques, the most commonly used MRD detection tool is immunophenotyping with multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) [ 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. ELN guidelines provide guidance regarding flow cytometry settings, the recommended panel of cell population identifiers, and gating strategy [ 22 ]. The two primary methods of MFC interpretation are known as leukemia-associated immunophenotype (LAIP) and different from normal (DfN) [ 23 ].…”
Section: Mrd Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%