Technikbasiertes Spiel von Tagespflegebesuchern mit und ohne Demenz

Ehret, Sonja; Putze, Felix; Miller-Teynor, Heike; Kruse, Andreas; Schultz, Tanja

doi:10.1007/s00391-016-1093-2

Cited by 28 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One used a cross-over design [ 63 ]. Six used quantitative non comparative methodologies [ 21 , 29 , 36 , 52 , 67 , 81 ]. An overview of the outcome measures used (related to SI) and the results are shown in Table 12 .…”

Section: Results Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two investigated the benefits of movable videoconferencing technology [21,52]. Finally four used technology as a way to prompt SI and communication through games and other apps [64,[67][68][69].…”

Section: Mixed Methods Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eleven studies used reminiscence programmes [16,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. Nine used technologies as a conversation prompt [23,[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. Three used programmes to prompt SI.…”

Section: Plos Digital Healthmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The use of technology for social interaction by people with dementia: A scoping review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People with dementia (PwD) are at risk of experiencing loneliness, which is associated with physical and mental health difficulties [1]. Technology is a possible tool to increase social connection and reduce loneliness. This scoping review aims to examine the current evidence regarding the use of technology to reduce loneliness in PwD. A scoping review was carried out. Medline, PsychINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane database, NHS Evidence, Trials register, Open Grey, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore were searched in April 2021. A sensitive search strategy was constructed using combinations of free text and thesaurus terms to retrieve articles about dementia, technology and social-interaction. Pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. Paper quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and results reported according to PRISMA guidelines [2,3]. 73 papers were identified publishing the results of 69 studies. Technological interventions included robots, tablets/computers and other forms of technology. Methodologies were varied and limited synthesis was possible. There is some evidence that technology is a beneficial intervention to reduce loneliness. Important considerations include personalisation and the context of the intervention. The current evidence is limited and variable; future research is warranted including studies with specific loneliness outcome measures, studies focusing on PwD living alone, and technology as part of intervention programmes.

show abstract