2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2026943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques to sort Bessel beams

Abstract: In this work we will present two techniques for the measurement of superimposed higher-order Bessel beams. In the first technique we will outline a simple approach using only a spatial light modulator and a Fourier transforming lens to decompose the OAM spectrum of an optical field. We test this approach on symmetric and non-symmetric superpositions of non-diffracting higher-order Bessel beams. Our second procedure consists of two refractive optical elements which perform a Cartesian to log-polar coordinate tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PVs with OAM have been extensively created [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and applied [20][21][22][23][24][25], but measurement techniques are still in their infancy [26]. In contrast, OAM has been measured qualitatively using mode sorters for Laguerre-Gaussian and helical beams [27][28][29][30], extended to radial modes [31,32], with adapted approaches to find the mode indices for Bessel-Gaussian [33][34][35] and Hermite-Gaussian modes [36]. This detects the mode but cannot return the full information of the field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVs with OAM have been extensively created [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and applied [20][21][22][23][24][25], but measurement techniques are still in their infancy [26]. In contrast, OAM has been measured qualitatively using mode sorters for Laguerre-Gaussian and helical beams [27][28][29][30], extended to radial modes [31,32], with adapted approaches to find the mode indices for Bessel-Gaussian [33][34][35] and Hermite-Gaussian modes [36]. This detects the mode but cannot return the full information of the field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%