2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production

Abstract: Ethanol use as a fuel additive or directly as a fuel source has grown in popularity due to governmental regulations and in some cases economic incentives based on environmental concerns as well as a desire to reduce oil dependency. As a consequence, several countries are interested in developing their internal market for use of this biofuel. Currently, almost all bio-ethanol is produced from grain or sugarcane. However, as this kind of feedstock is essentially food, other efficient and economically viable tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
262
0
48

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 632 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
0
262
0
48
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, conventional biofuels are unlikely to supply the current global biofuel demand using current technologies, and their implementation risks significant negative impacts on global food prices and security (Centre for International Economics 2007; Chisti 2007; Prime Minister's Science Engineering and Innovation Council 2010b, a; Borines et al 2011). In terms of volume, the algae biofuel industry appears to be the only current biofuel source that is capable of meeting the growing global demand (Chisti 2007), and farmed algae retain many of the regional development benefits of conventional biofuel industries, and, if undertaken judiciously, may mitigate some negative ecological and food security pressures (Gude et al 2010;Mussatto et al 2010). However, there are a number of additional uncertainties associated with industrial-scale microalgal production, including input resource limitations (water quality, nutrients, land, etc.)…”
Section: Industrial Microalgae Biofuel Efficiency Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, conventional biofuels are unlikely to supply the current global biofuel demand using current technologies, and their implementation risks significant negative impacts on global food prices and security (Centre for International Economics 2007; Chisti 2007; Prime Minister's Science Engineering and Innovation Council 2010b, a; Borines et al 2011). In terms of volume, the algae biofuel industry appears to be the only current biofuel source that is capable of meeting the growing global demand (Chisti 2007), and farmed algae retain many of the regional development benefits of conventional biofuel industries, and, if undertaken judiciously, may mitigate some negative ecological and food security pressures (Gude et al 2010;Mussatto et al 2010). However, there are a number of additional uncertainties associated with industrial-scale microalgal production, including input resource limitations (water quality, nutrients, land, etc.)…”
Section: Industrial Microalgae Biofuel Efficiency Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, commercial bioethanol fuel is primarily produced from corn (Zea mays) in the US, China, and Canada; sugarcane (Sacchrum officinale) in Brazil; sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) in France; wheat (Triticum aestivum) in China and Canada; and cassava (Manihot esculenta) in Thailand [1]. Most of current research and technology development for bioethanol production is focused on the use of agricultural and food residues as feedstock in order to reduce the feedstock cost and alleviate the competition between fuel and food/feed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most popular and studied microorganism in alcoholic fermentation. It can produce ethanol concentrations in broth up to 18% (v/v), grow and survive within those values and can be compatible with other microorganisms present in the fermentation [8][9][10]. To obtain ethanol in a purity of 96 and 99% distillation and dehydration processes can be performed respectively [2,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%