2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/picmet.2018.8481917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology and System Readiness Assessment for a Nuclear Energy R&D Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that a recent study has shown that the Technological Readiness Levels (TRL) model is being applied extensively across the world to assess the technological readiness of opportunitydriven projects (Judi HRL, 2022), but none of the papers has been evaluated on this model during the review process. This model was originally proposed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) as a type of measurement system for assessing the maturity level of a particular technology (Dixon et al, 2018;Salazar et al, 2020). The scale originally had seven levels but was subsequently upgraded to a nine-level scale, ranging from level 1 (basic observed and reported) to level 9 (actual system proven through successful mission operations) (Uflewska et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that a recent study has shown that the Technological Readiness Levels (TRL) model is being applied extensively across the world to assess the technological readiness of opportunitydriven projects (Judi HRL, 2022), but none of the papers has been evaluated on this model during the review process. This model was originally proposed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) as a type of measurement system for assessing the maturity level of a particular technology (Dixon et al, 2018;Salazar et al, 2020). The scale originally had seven levels but was subsequently upgraded to a nine-level scale, ranging from level 1 (basic observed and reported) to level 9 (actual system proven through successful mission operations) (Uflewska et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%