Technology Assessment: Emerging Automotive Technologies for the Future

Puthanpura, Aurobindh Kalathil; Khalifa, Rafaa; Chan, Leong; Barham, Husam

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68987-6_12

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These queries lead to a wider set of results due to Google Scholar's extensive capacity to find out documents throughout Internet servers and a wider variety of document sources and types. The attempt to increase the precision of results for geographic (Daouia and Laurent, 2015); -Nonparaeff (Oh and Suh, 2013); -npsf (Badunenko et al, 2017); -Productivity (Dakpo et al, 2016); -semsfa (Ferrara and Vidoli, 2015); -SFA (Straub, 2015); -spfrontier (Pavlyuk, 2016); -SSFA (Fusco and Vidoli, 2015); -TFDEA (Shott and Lim, 2015); -rDEA (Simm and Besstremyannaya, 2016); -DJL (Lim, 2016 Since the submission, we have found the following additional R packages: -Compind (Vidoli and Fusco, 2018); -MultiplierDEA (Puthanpura, 2018); -npbr (Daouia et al, 2017); -sfadv (Desjeux, 2017).…”

Section: Systematic Presentation and Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Productivity and Efficiency Analysis Software: An Exploratory Bibliographical Survey of the Options

Daraio

Kerstens

Nepomuceno

et al. 2018

Journal of Economic Surveys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The software available to implement and carry out efficiency analysis is crucial for the diffusion of efficiency frontier techniques among applied researchers and policy makers. The implementation of up‐to‐date productivity and efficiency analysis is indeed important to advance our knowledge in many fields, ranging from the public and regulated sectors to the private ones. This contribution fills a gap in the existing literature and surveys the currently available options to estimate a variety of frontier methodologies using either general or dedicated programs. We outline directions for future research.

show abstract

Section: Systematic Presentation and Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%