Technology growth in the digital age: Evidence from China

Jin, Canyang; Xu, Aiting; Zhu, Yanyan; Li, Jinchang

doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122221

Cited by 38 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As a result of increased labor costs, gradually rising energy prices, diminishing resource factors, and decreasing marginal efficiency of capital, the pace of economic growth in China is gradually decelerating (Wang et al 2019;Wang et al 2023). The mode of relying on investment, factors and trade to promote economic growth can no longer meet the needs of sustained growth, thus the economy must seek new sources of energy to stimulate its economic progress (Jin et al 2023;Yang et al 2021;Yao et al 2021) 1 . Therefore, the Chinese government has firmly advocated that innovation is key strategic foundation for building a modern economic system (Tu et al 2023).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The corporate path to green innovation: does the digital economy matter?

Wang

2023

Environ Sci Pollut Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As China’s digital transformation accelerates, there is growing interest in whether the digital economy can effectively boost green innovation in industrial enterprises and enable China’s development to break through the constraints of resources and environment. Therefore, this study analyzes the data of A-share industrial listed enterprises (2011–2020). Results indicate that the digital economy promotes green innovation. The impact of the digital economy on green innovation varies significantly among different types of enterprises, with stronger effects on state-owned enterprises. Digital economy enhances green innovation via boosting public attention and optimizing energy structure. Therefore, playing the role of monitoring public attention, and optimizing energy use are key strategies to promote corporate green innovation.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The corporate path to green innovation: does the digital economy matter?

Wang

2023

Environ Sci Pollut Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Fruit picking robots, drones spraying insecticides (Costa et al, 2023), radio frequency identification (RFID) technology [ 4 ], artificial intelligence [ 6 ] and so on, are typical digital technologies to improve productivity in agricultural sector [ 3 ]. Digital capital has already had a greater impact on industry development than traditional capital [ 26 ].…”

Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, digitization is a better way to preserve intangible cultural heritage, i.e., preserving and managing intangible cultural heritage through digital technology, such as constructing a database on intangible cultural heritage [ 10 , 11 ]. [ [25] , [26] , [27] , [30] , [31] , [28] , [29] ].…”

Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of digital economy on rural revitalization: Evidence from Guangdong, China

Deng,

Huang,

Peng

2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Dynamic capabilities support the premise that wealth arises from invention and creativity as the driving force behind current economic progress [56]. Specialized capital collaborates with other capital to use and aggregate ICT capital convergence toward value-adding intangible assets [15,57]. Dynamic capability uses configuration theory with routines with variables as an architectural model to direct the evolution of a firm's resource configuration using a path-dependent technique to produce alternative resource configurations and operational routines [13,19,[58][59][60][61].…”

Section: -2-dynamic Capabilitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

STEM Talent: A Game Changer in Organizational Digital Transformation

Jriyasetapong,

Kiattisin,

Darakorn Na Ayuthaya

2023

Emerg Sci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although organizational digital transformation (ODT) is implemented globally, Thailand and the Lao People's Democratic Republic do not possess the right factors for success under the tech-no-socio-economic paradigm. Organizations must modernize their capital resources, particularly their talent, in order to become agile, competitive, and resilient in the digital era. In this research, we identify and validate by proposing talent success factors and a framework for enabling and promoting ODT in Thailand and the Lao People's Democratic Republic. The statistical population consisted of 410 individuals who were observed in their digital businesses. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) shows that a four-factor model fits. The most influential factor for ODT was found to be transdisciplinary ontology talent (TOT), followed by mental model talent (MMT), enterprise architecture talent (EAT), and strategic agile talent (SAT). The findings demystified the four factors, entitled "STEM talent," in a comprehensive framework and its artifacts while explaining their respective influences. The article proposes a STEM talent and its framework for ODT with high potential, including but not limited to Thailand and the Lao People's Democratic Republic. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-020 Full Text: PDF

show abstract

Technology growth in the digital age: Evidence from China

Cited by 38 publications

References 39 publications

The corporate path to green innovation: does the digital economy matter?

The corporate path to green innovation: does the digital economy matter?

The impact of digital economy on rural revitalization: Evidence from Guangdong, China

STEM Talent: A Game Changer in Organizational Digital Transformation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About