2015
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teeth Tales: a community-based child oral health promotion trial with migrant families in Australia

Abstract: ObjectivesThe Teeth Tales trial aimed to establish a model for child oral health promotion for culturally diverse communities in Australia.DesignAn exploratory trial implementing a community-based child oral health promotion intervention for Australian families from migrant backgrounds. Mixed method, longitudinal evaluation.SettingThe intervention was based in Moreland, a culturally diverse locality in Melbourne, Australia.ParticipantsFamilies with 1–4-year-old children, self-identified as being from Iraqi, Le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
85
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
85
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…International standards for epidemiological oral health studies encourage consistency through the use of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) (Ismail et al , ). This was used in only one study, and while Gibbs and co‐workers describe the implementation of ICDAS II in detail (including training and calibration of examiners), they do not report any caries outcome data in their paper (Gibbs et al , ). A validated and reliable method of caries assessment (that can be conducted in non‐clinical settings) is required so that interventions can be evaluated and population level outcomes can be monitored overtime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International standards for epidemiological oral health studies encourage consistency through the use of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) (Ismail et al , ). This was used in only one study, and while Gibbs and co‐workers describe the implementation of ICDAS II in detail (including training and calibration of examiners), they do not report any caries outcome data in their paper (Gibbs et al , ). A validated and reliable method of caries assessment (that can be conducted in non‐clinical settings) is required so that interventions can be evaluated and population level outcomes can be monitored overtime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies have demonstrated health education interventions developed for the parents of the children (7)(8) . Evidence regarding the effectiveness of behavioral interventions in pre-schools, in order to promote the acquisition of knowledge on oral hygiene, behavior change and reduction of the prevalence of caries is insufficient (5,9) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otras referencias en la literatura han incluido el internet dentro de programas preventivos, el estudio por Gibbs y colaboradores (27) evaluó el efecto de un programa preventivo dirigido a padres de niños de 1 a 4 años de edad provenientes de familias de inmigrantes en Melburne, Australia, comparado con una intervención control; el estudio incluyó dos sesiones de tres horas sobre salud e higiene oral, una visita a la clínica odontológica más cercana al lugar de residencia de las familias y mensajes recordatorios a través de mensajes de texto, correos electrónicos o correo físico durante 4 meses, los resultados mostraron un riesgo relativo menor para acúmulo de placa bacteriana, OR=0,44, e inflamación gingival, OR=0,34, para los niños asignados al grupo experimental; sin embargo el 47 % de las 521 familias inicialmente incluidas en el estudio no terminaron el estudio. El estudio por Hurling y colaboradores (16) evaluó el uso de un programa de soporte por internet con el objetivo de mejorar la higiene oral de niños de 5 a 9 años de edad, el contenido ofrecido por internet incluía: caricaturas explicativas, objetivos personalizados y guías acerca del uso de recompensas y seguimiento, los niños que recibieron el programa de soporte reportaron un frecuencia 38 % mayor de realización del cepillado dental.…”
Section: Resultados Descripción De La Muestra De Pacientesunclassified