Telephonic nursing intervention for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hernia repair: A randomized controlled study

Schulz, Renata da Silva; Santana, Rosimere Ferreira; Santos, Carla Targino Bruno dos; Faleiro, Thiago Batista; Passarelles, Dayana Medeiros do Amaral; Hercules, Ana Beatriz Serra; Carmo, Thalita Gomes do

doi:10.1186/s12912-020-00432-y

Cited by 10 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Anxiety is a temporary emotional state of fear, nervousness and tension caused by a highly active autonomic system (Fu et al, 2020). This modifiable indicator or predictor is mentioned in seven of the articles reviewed (Ayyadhah Alanazi, 2014; Brown et al, 2018; Crump et al, 2015; Johansson Stark et al, 2014; McClurkin & Smith, 2016; Pettersson et al, 2017; da Silva Schulz et al, 2020).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many of these articles emphasise the importance of information flow between healthcare professionals and patients in facilitating the control of preoperative anxiety. This information flow might be achieved via prior consultations in which health education and structured information are provided, thus ensuring that the knowledge received is in line with the patient's expectations (Brown et al, 2018; Johansson Stark et al, 2014; Pettersson et al, 2017; da Silva Schulz et al, 2020). The factors that may influence the effectiveness of information transmission include the patient's education background, the presence or absence of depression, the training of the healthcare professionals involved and the time available for this purpose (Johansson Stark et al, 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 18 articles originally considered, three were discarded because the corresponding QATSDD score obtained was less than 65% (Perlini et al, 2020;Taylor et al, 2020). This cut-off point was established of based on reference 2014;Brown et al, 2018;Crump et al, 2015;Derseh et al, 2020;Dries, 2018;Husted, 2012;Johansson Stark et al, 2014;Liederbach et al, 2015;de Lorenzo-Pinto et al, 2019;McClurkin & Smith, 2016;Papadopoulos et al, 2016;Pettersson et al, 2017;da Silva Schulz et al, 2020;Vogl et al, 2015;Wyatt et al, 2018) (Table 2).…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the articles reviewed, the two most frequent years of publication were 2018 (Brown et al, 2018;Dries, 2018;Wyatt et al, 2018) and 2020 (Derseh et al, 2020;da Silva Schulz et al, 2020;Vogl et al, 2015) (n = 3), followed by 2012 (Husted, 2012;Johansson Stark et al, 2014), 2015 (Crump et al, 2015;Liederbach et al, 2015) (n = 2), 2011 (Papadopoulos et al, 2016), 2014 (Ayyadhah Alanazi, The articles reviewed were conducted in 18 countries and five continents. By location, the largest number of articles originated from the United States (17%), followed by Germany (10%), Australia, Brazil, Canada, United Kingdom and Sweden (7% each) and Austria, China, Denmark, Spain, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Islamic Republic of Iran, Iceland, Japan and Norway (3% each) (Figure 3).…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Articles Reviewedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This modifiable indicator or predictor is mentioned in seven of the articles reviewed (Ayyadhah Alanazi, 2014;Brown et al, 2018;Crump et al, 2015;Johansson Stark et al, 2014;McClurkin & Smith, 2016;Pettersson et al, 2017;da Silva Schulz et al, 2020).…”

Section: Preoperative Anxietymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Indicators and predictors modifiable by the nursing department during the preoperative period: A scoping review

Fernández

Fernández-Ordóñez

García‐Gámez

et al. 2022

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Due to rapid sociodemographic and technological change, the global demand for surgical attention is rising exponentially, requiring new strategies for optimisation and sustainability in perioperative care. Design: We conduced the scoping review using the methodology recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute supported with The PAGER framework and guided by the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Methods: Four databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and PUBMED) were examined to extract relevant published results for elective surgery on adult patients during the period 2011-2021. This process identified 609 records. Exclusion criteria were applied, and the sample was then evaluated with the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs (QATSDD), after which 15 studies remained. Results: The following preoperative indicators and/or predictors were considered: (1) Anxiety; (2) Pain; (3) Health education, knowledge and training; (4) Satisfaction; (5) Management/organisation (including costs, resources used/available, organisational issues, hospital stay (preoperative), standardisation and protocolisation. Conclusion: The identification of five indicators and/or predictors of complications or inefficiencies in the surgical process, which can be modified by nursing, allows the effective application of interventions in the preoperative phase, optimising care and improving health outcomes.Relevance to clinical practice: The development and implementation of specific nursing skills in the preoperative phase are essential to optimise the surgical process.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Articles Reviewedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Preoperative Anxietymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Indicators and predictors modifiable by the nursing department during the preoperative period: A scoping review

Fernández

Fernández-Ordóñez

García‐Gámez

et al. 2022

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Telemedicine in Surgical Care in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Scoping Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Access to timely and quality surgical care is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Telemedicine, defined as the remote provision of health care using information, communication and telecommunication platforms have the potential to address some of the barriers to surgical care. However, synthesis of evidence on telemedicine use in surgical care in LMICs is lacking. Aim To describe the current state of evidence on the use and distribution of telemedicine for surgical care in LMICs. Methods This was a scoping review of published and relevant grey literature on telemedicine use for surgical care in LMICs, following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guideline. PubMed-Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and African Journals Online databases were searched using a comprehensive search strategy from 1 January 2010 to 28 February 2021. Results A total of 178 articles from 53 (38.7%) LMICs across 11 surgical specialties were included. The number of published articles increased from 2 in 2010 to 44 in 2020. The highest number of studies was from the World Health Organization Western Pacific region ( n = 73; 41.0%) and of these, most were from China ( n = 69; 94.5%). The most common telemedicine platforms used were telephone call ( n = 71, 39.9%), video chat ( n = 42, 23.6%) and WhatsApp/WeChat ( n = 31, 17.4%). Telemedicine was mostly used for post-operative follow-up ( n = 71, 39.9%), patient education ( n = 32, 18.0%), provider training ( n = 28, 15.7%) and provider-provider consultation ( n = 16, 9.0%). Less than a third ( n = 51, 29.1%) of the studies used a randomised controlled trial design, and only 23 (12.9%) reported effects on clinical outcomes. Conclusion Telemedicine use for surgical care is emerging in LMICs, especially for post-operative visits. Basic platforms such as telephone calls and 2-way texting were successfully used for post-operative follow-up and education. In addition, file sharing and video chatting options were added when a physical assessment was required. Telephone calls and 2-way texting platforms should be leveraged to reduce loss to follow-up of surgical patients in LMICs and their use for pre-operative visits should be further explored. Despite these telemedicine potentials, there remains an uneven adoption across several LMICs. Also, up to two-thirds of the studies were of low-to-moderate quality with only a few focusing on clinical effectiveness. There is a need to further adopt, develop, and validate telemedicine use for surgical care in LMICs, particularly its impact on clinical outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version co...

show abstract

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Carolinas Comfort Scale to Brazilian Portuguese for inguinal hernia

Seabra,

Cavazzola

2024

Langenbecks Arch Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Telephonic nursing intervention for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hernia repair: A randomized controlled study

Cited by 10 publications

References 20 publications

Indicators and predictors modifiable by the nursing department during the preoperative period: A scoping review

Indicators and predictors modifiable by the nursing department during the preoperative period: A scoping review

Telemedicine in Surgical Care in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Scoping Review

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Carolinas Comfort Scale to Brazilian Portuguese for inguinal hernia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About