2007
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temocillin susceptibility by BSAC methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to BSAC, the breakpoints for temocillin are susceptible (≤32 μg/ml) and resistant (>32 μg/ml), and the zone diameter of ≥12 mm and ≤11 mm are defined as susceptible and resistant, respectively. [ 90 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to BSAC, the breakpoints for temocillin are susceptible (≤32 μg/ml) and resistant (>32 μg/ml), and the zone diameter of ≥12 mm and ≤11 mm are defined as susceptible and resistant, respectively. [ 90 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time during which free concentration (fT) stayed above a given MIC was calculated by linear interpolation between measured values for the different dosing regimens. Target attainment rate was calculated considering the fT ensuring a coverage of MIC up to 8 mg/L (temocillin breakpoint for systemic infections from the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) [21]) and 16 mg/L (presumed MIC for >90% of Enterobacteriaceae [22]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Belgian survey reported MIC 50/90 values of 8/16 mg/L for temocillin against these organisms [22]. Table 4 summarises the proportion of the dosing interval during which the free temocillin concentration remains above an MIC of 8 mg/L (fT >MIC8 ) or 16 mg/L (fT >MIC16 ) taken as tentative susceptibility breakpoint values for temocillin [21,24]. These values ranged from 78% to 90% and from 48% to 71% when considering fT >MIC8 and fT >MIC16 , respectively.…”
Section: Pharmacodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fosfomycin, Mueller–Hinton agar supplemented with glucose-6-phosphate was used for MIC determination according to the CLSI agar dilution method [ 9 , 10 ]. As there are currently no CLSI breakpoints for temocillin, the MICs to temocillin were performed using the BSAC’s microbroth dilution method [ 11 ] and interpreted according to the BSAC systemic and urinary breakpoints (≤8 mg/L and ≤32 mg/L respectively) [ 8 ]. ESBL detection was confirmed by the combination disks diffusion method according to the CLSI, using cefotaxime/ceftazidime with and without clavulanate [ 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus sought to evaluate the in vitro activity of temocillin and commonly used antimicrobials (including fosfomycin, tigecycline and colistin) against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in patients with urinary tract infections and/or bacteraemia in Hong Kong hospitals. Most laboratories in this region perform antimicrobial susceptibilities based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method, and as the susceptibility to temocillin had been based on the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC)-defined MIC breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae [ 8 ], we also examined and compared its activity using the microbroth dilution methods according to the CLSI and the BSAC methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%