2020
DOI: 10.37190/ppmp/124536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature influence on the electrode process in the presence of 6-thioguanine and surfactants

Abstract: The measurements concerning the process of the electroreduction of Bi(III) ions in the presence of 6-thioguanine (6TG) and Triton X-100 as well as Tween 80 in the 2 mol·dm-3 chlorates(VII) demonstrate a dependence of the process rate on temperature. The applied electrochemical techniques (DC polarography, cyclic and SWV voltammetry) allowed to determine the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters as well as their correlation with changes in kinetics of the electrode process. The catalytic activity of 6TG was conf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate theoretical research on the adsorption is possible on mercury electrodes (Kalvoda, 2007;Vyskocil, et al ., 2009;Barek, 2013). Very good reproducibility of the results obtained on the dropping mercury electrode results from homogeneity and purity of the double layer interface mercury -solution in comparison to solid electrodes and the possibility of using various measurement methods (Nieszporek, et al, 2019;Nieszporek , 2020;Kaliszczak, et al, 2020;Nosal-Wiercinska., et al 2020;Prado, et al, 2001;Sieńko et al, 2009;Nieszporek et al, 2018;Nieszporek, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accurate theoretical research on the adsorption is possible on mercury electrodes (Kalvoda, 2007;Vyskocil, et al ., 2009;Barek, 2013). Very good reproducibility of the results obtained on the dropping mercury electrode results from homogeneity and purity of the double layer interface mercury -solution in comparison to solid electrodes and the possibility of using various measurement methods (Nieszporek, et al, 2019;Nieszporek , 2020;Kaliszczak, et al, 2020;Nosal-Wiercinska., et al 2020;Prado, et al, 2001;Sieńko et al, 2009;Nieszporek et al, 2018;Nieszporek, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%