1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00045899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temple forests in India's forest development

Abstract: Historically the temple forests in India have served many spiritual and religious purposes. This paper stresses on the use of the underused repertoire of sacred acts to integrate the benefits of temple forests in rural development. The tree/plant species, planting design and the rituals related to their worship documented in the great epics, vedas and upanishads are of great value especially in the context of promoting forest development and the forest development led agricultural development. The Star, Planet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with previous reports from the Indian Subcontinent (Table 2) (Chandrakanth et al 1990;Dutta 2006;Gadgil and Guha 1993;Kumar et al 2011;Sitaramam et al 2009). We observed temples or shrines were common features at the base of large ahot gos (F. religiosa) and bor gos (F. benghalensis) trees (Table 1).…”
Section: Religious Status Of Fig In Assamsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is consistent with previous reports from the Indian Subcontinent (Table 2) (Chandrakanth et al 1990;Dutta 2006;Gadgil and Guha 1993;Kumar et al 2011;Sitaramam et al 2009). We observed temples or shrines were common features at the base of large ahot gos (F. religiosa) and bor gos (F. benghalensis) trees (Table 1).…”
Section: Religious Status Of Fig In Assamsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The local people thus, have cultural reasons in addition to economic ones to support the conservation of these temple lands from exploitation. Studies by Chandrakanth et al (1990), Gadgil and Rao (1994), Agarwal (1994) and Kothari et al (1995) in other areas, provide evidence of such nature-society relations. This could be seen from the conservation perspective as an advantage, and also a starting point for the management of STR to involve people in conservation and development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Harming the forest is forbidden by tradition and it is typically believed that any alteration of the forest, such as cutting wood for construction or firewood, hunting animals or other forms of resource extraction, will result in negative consequences to the person taking the resources (Gadgil & Vartak 1976;Chandrakanth et al 1990;Barre et al 2009). According to Chandrakanth et al (2004, p. 105), resource extraction from a sacred forest in India was perceived as a serious offence and 'traditional people believed that the punishment for such crimes would be to be reborn as urchins for thousands of years'.…”
Section: Sacred Groves As Community-conserved Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%