2019 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/visual.2019.8933544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TempoCave: Visualizing Dynamic Connectome Datasets to Support Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Abstract: Figure 1: A screenshot of the TempoCave application. Here, a user compares frames from pre-and post-treatment dynamic connectomes for an individual patient with major depression disorder. Using the option panels on either side of the application, a user can choose different visual encodings to accentuate features useful for understanding the activity of particular brain regions. The left and right coloring of the nodes indicates the modular affinity of a brain region for a patient's pre-and post-treatment conn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an illustrative example, we consider the problem of 3D edge bundling in complex network visualization (Bach et al, 2017;Ferreira et al, 2018;Holten & Van Wijk, 2009). We used MCPM to fit and visualize a human brain connectome (Xu et al, 2019), a set of 105 high-level nodes representing different subregions of the brain (so-called modes). To simplify this experiment (Figure 29), we disregard the connectome edges and simply weigh each node by its overall connectivity strength.…”
Section: Temporally Varying Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an illustrative example, we consider the problem of 3D edge bundling in complex network visualization (Bach et al, 2017;Ferreira et al, 2018;Holten & Van Wijk, 2009). We used MCPM to fit and visualize a human brain connectome (Xu et al, 2019), a set of 105 high-level nodes representing different subregions of the brain (so-called modes). To simplify this experiment (Figure 29), we disregard the connectome edges and simply weigh each node by its overall connectivity strength.…”
Section: Temporally Varying Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on visual network comparison has mainly focused on the development of practical approaches, e.g. for specific types of networks [33,53,55,57,66], and for structural overviews by abstraction or aggregation, see e.g. [10,35,67].…”
Section: Network Comparison and Visualization Metaphorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work includes both application-oriented research, e.g. in the context of connectome and brain activity analysis [50,66], and more fundamental investigations, e.g. on navigation [23,60], the influence of encodings [14], or the difference between immersive environments [17].…”
Section: Network Comparison and Visualization Metaphorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Network-based neuroscience visualization tools have demonstrated how to gain insight from connectome datasets, some at the level of functional modules, e.g. NeuroCave [16] and Tem-poCave [33], and some at the level of individual neurons, e.g. Brain-Trawler [8].…”
Section: Visual Analytics In Neuroimagingmentioning
confidence: 99%