1999
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x003900040032x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Shade on Creeping Bentgrass Turf

Abstract: Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) turf exposed to shade during morning hours may decline more readily than similar turf exposed to afternoon shade. This study compared the quality and physiological responses of creeping bentgrass turf exposed to morning shade with turf exposed to afternoon shade and evaluated responses of the same species exposed to varying shade densities during the same period. Semipermanent shade structures were placed on a creeping bentgrass range maintained at a 6.4-mm height.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In nature, trees alter spectral quality available for turfgrass development (Bell et al, 2000); however, limited research has investigated the light specific tree species filter in highly maintained turfgrass environments. Also, most turfgrass shade research has focused on light quantity using black neutral shade material (Bell and Danneberger, 1999; Koh et al, 2003; Steinke and Stier, 2003; Bunnell et al, 2005a; Baldwin et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nature, trees alter spectral quality available for turfgrass development (Bell et al, 2000); however, limited research has investigated the light specific tree species filter in highly maintained turfgrass environments. Also, most turfgrass shade research has focused on light quantity using black neutral shade material (Bell and Danneberger, 1999; Koh et al, 2003; Steinke and Stier, 2003; Bunnell et al, 2005a; Baldwin et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putting green management research has typically focused on the two major species for putting greens: (i) hybrid bermudagrass (Brown et al, 1977; Goatley et al, 1994; Snyder and Cisar, 2000; Hollingsworth et al, 2005) or, (ii) creeping bentgrass ( Agrostris palustris Huds.) (Salaiz et al, 1995; Bell and Danneberger, 1999; McCarty et al, 2005). These researchers evaluated treatment responses on established greens, and not during the establishment period, when management practices might differ from those used on an established green.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the initial 20 min of stirring, the extracts treated with DMF were noticeably darker green and had less green tissue remaining than extracts with acetone. Bell and Danneberger [12] were unable to elucidate this pigment in creeping bentgrass using simple 80% acetone extraction and the same HPLC procedure. This visual observation was supported by HPLC area unit results ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Those studies used extinction coefficients and formulas obtained from work by Moran, [14] or more recently by Inskeep and Bloom [15] for pigment quantification. Bell and Danneberger [12] used acetone extraction and HPLC to simultaneously assess chlorophylls and carotenoids, including xanthophylls, of creeping bentgrass grown in shade and full sun. [1] In a study testing chlorophyll content of turfgrasses following application of plant growth regulators, Gaussoin et al [19] used DMF for extraction to prepare for spectrophotometric pigment analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%