2020
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2020.1841895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporality, consumption, and conflict: exploring user-based injustices in European low-carbon transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At its heart energy justice is about: a) the balanced distribution of costs and benefits across society [157]; b) recognising individuals and treating them fairly [37]; and c) inclusive decision making processes that are open to all relevant stakeholders [158]. Whilst a large number of studies aimed at better understanding the (in)justices that exist within current energy systems [3,4], we do not fully understand the energy justice impacts of smart local energy systems, which are becoming increasingly common. Furthermore, whilst many governments advocate SLES as a means to reach their decarbonisation goals [7,21], much remains unknown about the wider changes necessary to ensure these projects support energy justice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At its heart energy justice is about: a) the balanced distribution of costs and benefits across society [157]; b) recognising individuals and treating them fairly [37]; and c) inclusive decision making processes that are open to all relevant stakeholders [158]. Whilst a large number of studies aimed at better understanding the (in)justices that exist within current energy systems [3,4], we do not fully understand the energy justice impacts of smart local energy systems, which are becoming increasingly common. Furthermore, whilst many governments advocate SLES as a means to reach their decarbonisation goals [7,21], much remains unknown about the wider changes necessary to ensure these projects support energy justice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This affords them the privilege of choice, creating a basis for injustice between higher and lower income households and communities [112]. Adoption is purely based on individual means and the choices this affords [4].…”
Section: Energy Autonomy Motivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations