2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6519(03)78467-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test de olfato de connecticut (cccrc): valores en voluntarios sanos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously defined (Toledano et al, 2003), a score of 5 points or more indicates normosmia, a score between 2 and 4.5 points indicates reduced olfactory function in terms of hyposmia, and a score of less than 2 points indicates functional anosmia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As previously defined (Toledano et al, 2003), a score of 5 points or more indicates normosmia, a score between 2 and 4.5 points indicates reduced olfactory function in terms of hyposmia, and a score of less than 2 points indicates functional anosmia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Connecticut Test, in which the odor stimulus is contained in suitable glass flasks ( 47 ) is quite similar to the Brief-Smell Identification Test (see Table 1 ), which is administered in older people and can be used for the evaluation and diagnosis of patients with olfactory impairments, considering the advantage of its low cost. An important issue about CCCRC is that low scores can be indicative of TBI, while abnormal detection thresholds may reflect altered olfactory cell function ( 49 ). Langdon et al ( 48 ) evaluated severe smell loss in TBI patients using the Barcelona Smell Test (BAST-24), validated for the Catalan and Spanish population.…”
Section: Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods In Olfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this method, the lower the concentration detected by the subject – olfactory threshold – the better the olfactory performance ( Cain, 1983, b ; Cain and Gent. 1988 ; Toledano et al 2003 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%