PsycEXTRA Dataset 2002
DOI: 10.1037/e307362004-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Review: Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST), Miller, 2001.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MFAST was created to serve as an abbreviated parallel to the widely used Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS; Rogers, 1992). Preliminary validational research on the MFAST has demonstrated that the MFAST is a tool that shows promise in accurately distinguishing between honest and dishonest response styles (Zapf & Galloway, 2002). For example, in an initial investigation to determine the effectiveness of the MFAST in detecting malingering during disability screenings, Miller, Guy, and Davila (2000) found that malingerers (as defined by SIRS scores) earned significantly higher total MFAST scores than did honest responders.…”
Section: Importance Of Assessing For Malingering In Ptsd Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MFAST was created to serve as an abbreviated parallel to the widely used Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS; Rogers, 1992). Preliminary validational research on the MFAST has demonstrated that the MFAST is a tool that shows promise in accurately distinguishing between honest and dishonest response styles (Zapf & Galloway, 2002). For example, in an initial investigation to determine the effectiveness of the MFAST in detecting malingering during disability screenings, Miller, Guy, and Davila (2000) found that malingerers (as defined by SIRS scores) earned significantly higher total MFAST scores than did honest responders.…”
Section: Importance Of Assessing For Malingering In Ptsd Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%