1974
DOI: 10.15554/pcij.05011974.92.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test to Failure of a Prestressed Concrete Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6 Experimental tests are the most straightaway method to study both flexural and shear behavior of these structures. Some research studies investigated the flexural behavior [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] of full-scale existing PC bridges or parts of these (e.g., deck, slabs, and girders), while others focused on their shear behavior. [14][15][16][17] These works demonstrated how existing PC bridges with none-to-slight damage or deterioration ensured satisfactory load-bearing capacity, overperforming structural requirements by code provisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Experimental tests are the most straightaway method to study both flexural and shear behavior of these structures. Some research studies investigated the flexural behavior [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] of full-scale existing PC bridges or parts of these (e.g., deck, slabs, and girders), while others focused on their shear behavior. [14][15][16][17] These works demonstrated how existing PC bridges with none-to-slight damage or deterioration ensured satisfactory load-bearing capacity, overperforming structural requirements by code provisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, only a few reinforced concrete (RC) bridges have been investigated with regard to shearrelated failures, with research limited to the studies reported by Burdette and Goodpasture (1971) (1977), Pedersen et al (1980), Plos et al (1990), Aktan et al (1992), Azizinamini et al (1994), Isaksen et al (1998), Haritos et al (2000), Pressley et al (2004) and Puurula et al (2015). The outcomes from these studies have also been summarised and further discussed in Bagge et al (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates accurate prediction of load distribution but inaccurate prediction of total structural stiflhess. Burdette and Goodpasture (1974) describe the ultimate load test of a decommissioned prestressed concrete highway bridge. The objective of the research was to observe the behavior of the bridge as it was progressively loaded to failure and to compare the load-deflection behavior with that obtained from analytical predictions based on the strain compatibility method.…”
Section: Bridge Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%