2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2016.10.874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Test Xpert ® MTB/RIF et dépistage des nouveaux cas de tuberculose pulmonaire en routine dans une zone de haute endémicité tuberculeuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded it because of concern about duplicate data. In addition, the criteria for the reference standard for rifampicin resistance detection were not satisfiedFong 2017AbstractFriedrich 2011aThis study evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of pleural TBGama de Andrade 2017AbstractGelalcha 2017Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentGounder 2014Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentGriesel 2016AbstractGriesel 2017Includes data for pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB combinedGuenaoui 2016Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentGupta 2014AbstractGurbanova 2016AbstractGurbanova 2017Includes data for pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB combinedGursoy 2016Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHabeenzu 2017Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHanifa 2016Reference standard not satisfiedHeidebrecht 2016Data insufficient for 2 x 2 tableHillemann 2011This study evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TBHiza 2017Not a diagnostic accuracy studyHo 2016Community‐based screeningHoro 2017Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHu 2014Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHuang 2018Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHuerga 2017Xpert was not the index testIoannidis 2010We could not obtain this article…”
Section: Characteristics Of Excluded Studies [Ordered By Study Id]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded it because of concern about duplicate data. In addition, the criteria for the reference standard for rifampicin resistance detection were not satisfiedFong 2017AbstractFriedrich 2011aThis study evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of pleural TBGama de Andrade 2017AbstractGelalcha 2017Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentGounder 2014Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentGriesel 2016AbstractGriesel 2017Includes data for pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB combinedGuenaoui 2016Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentGupta 2014AbstractGurbanova 2016AbstractGurbanova 2017Includes data for pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB combinedGursoy 2016Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHabeenzu 2017Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHanifa 2016Reference standard not satisfiedHeidebrecht 2016Data insufficient for 2 x 2 tableHillemann 2011This study evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TBHiza 2017Not a diagnostic accuracy studyHo 2016Community‐based screeningHoro 2017Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHu 2014Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHuang 2018Includes both adults and children or no information about age of enrolmentHuerga 2017Xpert was not the index testIoannidis 2010We could not obtain this article…”
Section: Characteristics Of Excluded Studies [Ordered By Study Id]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopic examination after ZN staining remains the most accessible and least expensive examination in semi-urban areas, with a more or less acceptable sensitivity [12]. Compared to the result of Horo et al [18] who found a sensitivity of 85% with respect to the reference test, which is the culture. The variability of its diagnostic performance is related to the quality of the samples, the bacillary richness of the sputum, the dye used and the experience of the reader.…”
Section: Microscopy and Xpert Mtb/rif ® Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%