2016
DOI: 10.1177/1073191116683799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing and Extending Schwartz Refined Value Theory Using a Best–Worst Scaling Approach

Abstract: The theory of human values (Schwartz, 1992) discriminated 10 basic values arrayed in a quasicircular structure. Analyses with several instruments in numerous samples supported this structure (Schwartz, 2015). The refined theory of human values (Schwartz et al. 2012, in press) discriminates 19 values in the same circle. Its support depends on one instrument, the revised Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ-R). We introduce a forced choice method, the Best-Worst Value scale (BWVr), to assess the robustness of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The unquestionable advantage of this tool is its popularity and presence in the European Social Survey – but some of its shortcomings are also mentioned in the literature (e.g., limited discriminant validity of the different values; Knoppen and Saris, 2009). Moreover, Schwartz’s circular model of values has been intensely developed since the short PVQ tool was created, proving that there can be more values to be distinguished in this model, as many as 19 (Lee et al, 2019). Lastly, Schwartz’s model presents an effective framework for conducting this type of research (it is commonly used and amended), but it is not the only value theory in psychology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unquestionable advantage of this tool is its popularity and presence in the European Social Survey – but some of its shortcomings are also mentioned in the literature (e.g., limited discriminant validity of the different values; Knoppen and Saris, 2009). Moreover, Schwartz’s circular model of values has been intensely developed since the short PVQ tool was created, proving that there can be more values to be distinguished in this model, as many as 19 (Lee et al, 2019). Lastly, Schwartz’s model presents an effective framework for conducting this type of research (it is commonly used and amended), but it is not the only value theory in psychology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents were asked to select the most and the least important values from five value statements in each of 21 value choice sets. Following Lee et al (2019), the simple count method was used to compute value scores that ranged from −1 (the least important) to +1 (the most important). Each respondent's four higher-order value scores (openness to change, self-enhancement, conservation and self-transcendence) were computed as the average of the associated values types (Schwartz et al 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal values. As in study 1, respondents' values were measured using the Best-Worst Refined Values scale (BWVr; Lee et al 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Muitos pesquisadores avaliaram a congruência de valores entre funcionários e organizações (Byza, Dörr, Schuh & Maier, 2017;Lee et al, 2017), entre funcionários e seus líderes (Qu, Dasborough, Zhou & Todorova, 2017;Lajoie, Boudrias, Rousseau & Brunelle, 2017;Jensen, 2018) e da perspectiva de uma das empresas envolvidas no relacionamento (Kashyap & Sivadas, 2012;Sabbir & Nazrul, 2014;Wang & Zhang, 2017;He, Huang & Wu, 2018), mas não foram encontrados, a partir da pesquisa bibliométrica realizada, estudos que identifiquem os valores humanos pessoais dos boundary spanners em ambos os lados da díade em canais de marketing.…”
unclassified