2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2005.12.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing high-Z QED with SuperEBIT: An estimate of the two-loop Lamb shift based on a measurement of the – transition in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To do so, we scale the two-loop QED of the 2s level the same way theory predicts the scaling for the one-loop QED term [40]. This means we have to multiply the results for the 1s 2 2p 1/2 → 1s 2 2s 1/2 transition by −6.39 and obtain −1.27±0.45 eV.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we scale the two-loop QED of the 2s level the same way theory predicts the scaling for the one-loop QED term [40]. This means we have to multiply the results for the 1s 2 2p 1/2 → 1s 2 2s 1/2 transition by −6.39 and obtain −1.27±0.45 eV.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(45) recent measurement of the 2s 1/2 -2p 1/2 transition in lithiumlike U 89+ on the Livermore SuperEBIT electron beam ion trap [44], which we discuss in more detail below, allowed us to make the first such test of two-loop QED in hydrogen-like U 91+ . As shown in [44,47] and summarized in table 1, the measurement gives a value of 1.27 (45) eV for the two-loop contribution to the 1s level. This is a test of the predicted twoloop contribution at the 33% level.…”
Section: Testing Two-loop Diagrams In Hydrogen-like Uraniummentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In fact, using the result from the 2s two-loop QED determination we can already determine a value of −1.27 eV for the two-loop QED in 1s [44,47] as we have mentioned in section 3. This value compares very favourably to the value calculated by Yerokhin et al [46].…”
Section: Contributing Term Valuementioning
confidence: 96%