2011
DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2011.616451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TestingResource Description and Access(RDA) with Non-MARC Metadata Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example Wacker et al, (2011) observed that while MODS largely met the encoding needs of RDA, that DC and EAD proved to be more problematic in part because they had fewer structures to show relationships between repeating fields (e.g., multiple content-type entries) and lack of specificity in mapping RDA concepts to other metadata standards (e.g., DC). On the other hand, Wacker et al observed that the RDA vocabularies were useful in creating non-MARC records by adding specificity to description and enabling the use of URIs to store data in addition to text-based values.…”
Section: Technical/encoding Opportunities and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example Wacker et al, (2011) observed that while MODS largely met the encoding needs of RDA, that DC and EAD proved to be more problematic in part because they had fewer structures to show relationships between repeating fields (e.g., multiple content-type entries) and lack of specificity in mapping RDA concepts to other metadata standards (e.g., DC). On the other hand, Wacker et al observed that the RDA vocabularies were useful in creating non-MARC records by adding specificity to description and enabling the use of URIs to store data in addition to text-based values.…”
Section: Technical/encoding Opportunities and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These comments emphasized the implications of creating RDA records using old encoding standard (e.g., MARC), the implications on usability for patrons (e.g., the inability of the system to show both GMD and 33x data in the same way), and the need for consistent main entry creation and authority control. This call for local documentation was even more marked in articles on the cataloging of Hebraica (Biella & Lerner, 2011) and non-MARC formats (Wacker et al, 2011). In each of these cases, RDA rules proved to be insufficient to guide cataloging without further local definition.…”
Section: Cataloging Tool Efficacymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Wacker, Han, and Dartt described their libraries' experiences using RDA with non-MARC metadata (Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), Encoded Archival Description (EAD), and Dublin Core) as part of the national U.S. RDA test. 22 Weber and Austin published a monographic "how-to-do-it" manual for describing electronic and digital media using AACR2 and RDA in 2011, but the rapid changes to the RDA code since may limit the usefulness of this publication. 23 Regarding implications on local cataloging policies and procedures, this is an area where the body of literature is small but growing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Além disso, diversos autores (ALVES; SANTOS; DUDAS, 2013;JAEGGER;SILVA, 2013;SERRA, 2013;TANIGUCHI, 2013;WACKER;HAN;DARTT, 2011) também examinam aspectos tecnológicos que envolvem linguagens, metadados e softwares para acomodar os novos padrões de catalogação. Grande parte dos autores discute questões relacionadas às regras no tratamento descritivo de recursos; contudo, um pequeno grupo cita questões que envolvem também o tratamento temático de recursos, como a indexação, por exemplo.…”
Section: Temas De Interesse Sobre Catalogação E Rdaunclassified