2016
DOI: 10.17559/tv-20140930145702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing of site-specific yield in different harvest passes

Abstract: Original scientific paper This paper analyzes the differences in mass yield of moist rapeseed grain for six different passes of combine harvester along the plot. The Mann-Whitney U test and Z-statistic are used for analysis needs. For harvest pass 1 and pass 4 the Z-value is only 0,211, whereas the statistical significance level to confirm this finding is 0,8333, therefore there is not statistically significant difference between yield levels in mentioned passes. It is established that there are another three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigation of differences between draft force values from one pass to another was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was proved for differences in yield values between individual passes during harvest [16,17]. Plowing is a more challenging operation in terms of measuring and analysis, primarily due to smaller working width and greater data variability but, at the same time, the draft force and soil force resistance mapping, respectively, generate multiple times better resolutions regarding data variability than during harvesting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of differences between draft force values from one pass to another was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was proved for differences in yield values between individual passes during harvest [16,17]. Plowing is a more challenging operation in terms of measuring and analysis, primarily due to smaller working width and greater data variability but, at the same time, the draft force and soil force resistance mapping, respectively, generate multiple times better resolutions regarding data variability than during harvesting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%