Testing the applicability of a conceptual model of oral health in housebound edentulous older people

Baker, Sarah R.; Pearson, Nicola; Robinson, Peter G.

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00394.x

Cited by 36 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Baker et al 10 modeled data from a general population sample with a full range of oral health and ill health. These authors argue that Locker's conceptual model provides a generic oral health model that is applicable across a broad range of settings.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The bootstrap framework has been advocated as the best approach to testing direct and indirect effects in mediation models. 8,10,11 Following Shrout and Bolger's 20 techniques, 1000 bootstrap samples were created to derive less biased standard errors and 95% confidence interval (CI) bootstrap percentiles. These biasedcorrected, or bootstrapped standard error and CIs, have been shown to be more accurate for calculating indirect effects.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…8,9 These have included the oral health of the general adult population, the burden of being edentulous, and the dental caries experience. [8][9][10][11] However, to date it has not been determined whether, for malocclusion patients, the constructs in Locker's model relate to one another as hypothesized.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Developing knowledge of key pathways will help facilitate the design of intervention strategies by, for example, guiding clinicians as to where and how to intervene most effectively in patients with malocclusion. 10 Finally, ongoing development of the OHRQoL, as in any field of inquiry, requires key concepts to the explored and disentangled. Only by testing the empirical validity of a model can alternatives be proposed to address any identified weaknesses.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Development of a conceptual model of oral health for malocclusion patients

Masood

Newton

et al. 2014

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:To provide an empirical test of the applicability of Locker's conceptual model of oral health for malocclusion patients, and to suggest alternative models of the effect of malocclusion on well-being. Materials and Methods: Data from a survey of 323 adolescents attending for orthodontic treatment were analyzed to develop a new oral health model for malocclusion patients. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured using the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile; malocclusion was measured using the Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Using structural equation modeling, the relationship between conceptual domains in Locker's model was explored and three models of their interrelationship tested for goodness of fit. Results: Fit indexes for Locker's model indicated that it did not fit the data well. Therefore, a modified model was developed to incorporate additional paths between other levels to better fit the data. The best fit was provided by a model in which the direct effects of malocclusion on pain, discomfort, and handicapping-and the direct effect of pain on disability-were removed. A direct effect of functional limitation on disability was allowed. The modified Oral Health Impact Profile model proved to be a good fit to the data (root mean square error of approximation 5 0.069). Conclusion: The pathways identified in Locker's (1988) conceptual model of oral health may not be appropriate for describing the relationships between OHRQoL constructs in individuals with malocclusion. An alternative model is proposed. (Angle Orthod.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Development of a conceptual model of oral health for malocclusion patients

Masood

Newton

et al. 2014

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Their model is directly applicable to oral health. 104,105 Changes to clinical factors (tooth decay and periodontal diseases) cause symptoms which lead to variations in OHQoL. However, individual and environmental factors intervene in these relationships by exerting independent DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04180 HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016 VOL.…”

Section: Rationale For Choice Of Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

The INCENTIVE study: a mixed-methods evaluation of an innovation in commissioning and delivery of primary dental care compared with traditional dental contracting

Hulme

Robinson

Douglas

et al. 2016

Health Serv Deliv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Godson J, et al. The INCENTIVE study: a mixed-methods evaluation of an innovation in commissioning and delivery of primary dental care compared with traditional dental contracting. Health Serv Deliv Res 2016;4(18). Health Services and Delivery ResearchISSN 2050-4349 (Print) ISSN 2050-4357 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HS&DR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Services and Delivery Research journalReports are published in Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HS&DR programme or programmes which preceded the HS&DR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. HS&DR programmeThe Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was established to fund a broad range of research. It combines the strengths and contributions of two previous NIHR research programmes: the Health Services Research (HSR) programme and the Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) programme, which were merged in January 2012.The HS&DR programme aims to produce rigorous and relevant evidence on the quality, access and organisation of health services including costs and outcomes, as well as research on implementation. The programme will enhance the strategic focus on research that matters to the NHS and is keen to support ambitious evaluative research to improve health services.For more information about the HS&DR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hsdr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HS&DR programme or one of its preceding programmes as project number 09/1004/04. The contractual start date was in January 2012. The final report began editorial review in June 2015 and was accepted for publication in October 2015. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HS&DR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the...

show abstract

Applying Health Psychology to Dentistry: ‘People, Not Teeth’

Baker¹

2012

Health Psychology in Action

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Testing the applicability of a conceptual model of oral health in housebound edentulous older people

Cited by 36 publications

References 38 publications

Development of a conceptual model of oral health for malocclusion patients

Development of a conceptual model of oral health for malocclusion patients

The INCENTIVE study: a mixed-methods evaluation of an innovation in commissioning and delivery of primary dental care compared with traditional dental contracting

Applying Health Psychology to Dentistry: ‘People, Not Teeth’

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About