The 3-D Commission: Forging a Transdisciplinary Synthesis at the Intersection of Social Determinants of Health, Data, and Decision-making

Abdalla, Salma M; Galea, Sandro

doi:10.1007/s11524-021-00555-w

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Depression is associated with a range of other negative health outcomes, including diabetes, cardiac disease, stroke, substance use, and premature mortality ( Galea & Ettman, 2021 ; Kessler, 2012 ). Understanding the scope of population depressive symptoms can help inform decision making and public priorities that aim to reduce the burden of poor population mental health ( Abdalla & Galea, 2021 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of depressive symptoms in U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

Ettman¹,

Fan²,

Subramanian³

et al. 2023

SSM - Population Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of depressive symptoms in U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

Ettman¹,

Fan²,

Subramanian³

et al. 2023

SSM - Population Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A number of initiatives, such as Health in All Policies, have been proposed as potential pathways to translate scholarship to action on SDoH. Yet, wider policy and political action on SDoH remains in its early stages 14–19…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What matters for health? Public views from eight countries

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionDespite growing scholarship on the social determinants of health (SDoH), wider action remains in its early stages. Broad public understanding of SDoH can help catalyse such action. This paper aimed to document public perception of what matters for health from countries with broad geographic, cultural, linguistic, population composition, language and income level variation.MethodsWe conducted an online survey in Brazil, China, Germany, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Nigeria and the USA to assess rankings of what respondents thought matters for health and what they perceived decision makers think matters for health. We analysed the percentages of each determinant rated as the most important for good health using two metrics: the top selection and a composite of the top three selections. We used two-tailed χ2 test for significance testing between groups.ResultsOf 8753 respondents, 56.2% (95% CI 55.1% to 57.2%) ranked healthcare as the most important determinant of good health using the composite metric. This ranking was consistent across countries except in China where it appeared second. While genetics was cited as the most important determinant by 22.3% (95% CI 21.5% to 23.2%) of the overall sample with comparable rates in most countries, the percentage increased to 33.3% (95% CI 30.5% to 36.3%) in Germany and 35.9% (95% CI 33.0% to 38.8%) in the USA. Politics was the determinant with the greatest absolute difference (18.5%, 95% CI 17.3% to 19.6%) between what respondents considered matters for health versus what they perceived decision makers think matters for health.ConclusionThe majority of people consider healthcare the most important determinant of health, well above other social determinants. This highlights the need for more investment in communication efforts around the importance of SDoH.

show abstract

Assets and depression in U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

Ettman,

Subramanian,

Fan

et al. 2023

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 3-D Commission: Forging a Transdisciplinary Synthesis at the Intersection of Social Determinants of Health, Data, and Decision-making

Cited by 3 publications

References 10 publications

Prevalence of depressive symptoms in U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

Prevalence of depressive symptoms in U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

What matters for health? Public views from eight countries

Assets and depression in U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About