2016
DOI: 10.1017/pasa.2015.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 3D Structure of the Galactic Bulge

Abstract: We review the observational evidences concerning the three-dimensional structure of the Galactic bulge. Although the inner few kpc of our Galaxy are normally referred to as the bulge, all the observations demonstrate that this region is dominated by a bar, i.e., the bulge is a bar. The bar has a boxy/peanut (X-shaped) structure in its outer regions, while it seems to become less and less elongated in its innermost region. A thinner and longer structure departing from the main bar has also been found, although … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 we present the results for the φ bar = 25 • and 40 • view angles. Similar to the results of Gonzalez et al (2011) and also Zoccali & Valenti (2016), we "observe" bars much more inclined than the assumed bar angle and the bar angle changes between |l| =5-10 • . This is due to the projection effect and the existence of the bulge which was nicely shown, using N -body simulations, by Gerhard & Martinez-Valpuesta (2012).…”
Section: Inner Bar Structuresupporting
confidence: 87%
“…16 we present the results for the φ bar = 25 • and 40 • view angles. Similar to the results of Gonzalez et al (2011) and also Zoccali & Valenti (2016), we "observe" bars much more inclined than the assumed bar angle and the bar angle changes between |l| =5-10 • . This is due to the projection effect and the existence of the bulge which was nicely shown, using N -body simulations, by Gerhard & Martinez-Valpuesta (2012).…”
Section: Inner Bar Structuresupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, one of the simulated halos (Aq-C-5) showed a good match with the spatial, kinematic, and metallicity properties observed in the MW (Zoccali & Valenti 2016). The analysis of the assembly history of the central regions shows that this halo did not accrete satellite galaxies more massive than ∼10…”
Section: The Simulated Aquarius Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Furthermore, photometric data from Pan-STARRS1 (Chambers et al 2016), 2MASS (Skrutskie et al 2006) and AllWISE (Wright et al 2010), combined with Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration et al 2018) reveal the Galactic bar ⋆ E-mail: jun.baba@nao.ac.jp; babajn2000@gmail.com (JB); d.kawata@ucl.ac.uk (DK) shape in the inner Galactic disc (Anders et al 2019). These observations suggest that the orientation of the major axis of the Galactic bar relative to the axis along the Sun and the Galactic centre is about 25 • (for reviews, Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard 2016;Zoccali & Valenti 2016). Using kinematic data of the bar/bulge stars, recent studies suggest that the current pattern speed of the Galactic bar is about 40 km s −1 kpc −1 (Portail et al 2017;Bovy et al 2019), as opposed to a fast pattern speed inferred from the kinematics of the solar neighbourhood stars (Dehnen 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%