2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/884/1/012140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accuracy of 15 – 25 years age estimation using panoramic radiograph with thevissen method in Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 14 studies found from the conducted search, which summarized in Table 1. The age coverage of the most study was young adult and children (71%) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] . Only three studies which involved age range more than 25 years [21][22][23] .…”
Section: Dental Age Estimation In Indonesian Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were 14 studies found from the conducted search, which summarized in Table 1. The age coverage of the most study was young adult and children (71%) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] . Only three studies which involved age range more than 25 years [21][22][23] .…”
Section: Dental Age Estimation In Indonesian Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most age estimation method applied in Indonesian population was Demirjian's method, with or without modification (35.71%) 11,12,15,16,21 , followed by TCI-Benindra's method (21.42%) [18][19][20] , and the other methods (7.14%-13%), as presented in Figure 1. Panoramic radiograph was the most used sample for the studies (53%) 11,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21]23 , followed by clinical examination (17%) 13,14,24 , periapical radiograph (12%) 18,19 , lateral cephalometric radiograph (12%) 18,19 , and CBCT (6%) 22 (Figure 2).…”
Section: Dental Age Estimation In Indonesian Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%