2017
DOI: 10.1002/mus.25949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adaptive response of skeletal muscle: What is the evidence?

Abstract: Adult skeletal muscle is capable of adapting its properties in response to changing functional demands. This now sounds like a statement of the obvious, and many people assume it has always been this way. A mere 40 years ago, however, the picture was entirely different. In this Review and personal memoir, I outline the scientific context in which the theory was generated, the objections to it from entrenched opinion, and the way those objections were progressively met. The material should be of some historical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(215 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The adult skeletal muscle is capable of adapting its properties in response to changing functional demands (SALMONS, 2017). The diversity of fibers provides the muscle an adaptation capacity in its myofibrillar system to continuously adjust to functional needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adult skeletal muscle is capable of adapting its properties in response to changing functional demands (SALMONS, 2017). The diversity of fibers provides the muscle an adaptation capacity in its myofibrillar system to continuously adjust to functional needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lower extremity muscles examined (vastus lateralis), a stimulation period of approximately one year was indicated [19] . A literature search revealed that there were no study data available for the upper extremities in humans, but animal studies demonstrated that the effect achieved by direct muscle stimulation was not muscle specific regardless of their localization, function and fiber type composition [3] . That observation may imply the usefulness of ES also to any denervated human muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a LMN lesion, structural and functional transformations of muscle properties occur different from those observed after an upper motor neuron (UMN) lesion. Denervation atrophy implies a decrease in muscle fiber diameters and a partial transformation into connective and adipose tissue in the muscle affected [3] . Interestingly, Helgason and coworkers found that electrical stimulation (ES) could restore contractile properties in structurally altered muscles of the lower extremities [4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual skeletal muscle fibers possess a remarkable ability to adapt to altered physical demands and can adjust both the overall size, metabolic‐ and vascular apparatus and capacity to meet the new functional requisites 7 . The question of whether muscle fiber types can change phenotype from one type to another as a result of changes in muscle activity has been studied experimentally since the start of the 1960s and 1970s in animal models 8 and humans, 9 respectively. In humans, the type 2A and type 2X muscle fibers seem to readily interconvert in response to changes in physical activity patterns, in that increased physical activity increases the relative number of type 2A muscle fibers on the expense of the relative number of type 2X muscle fibers, 10‐12 and vice versa by reduced activity patterns 11,12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%